TSUKY
Price
$65.06
Change
+$2.67 (+4.28%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
4.26B
WHGLY
Price
$19.20
Change
+$0.12 (+0.63%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
6.94B
Interact to see
Advertisement

TSUKY vs WHGLY

Header iconTSUKY vs WHGLY Comparison
Open Charts TSUKY vs WHGLYBanner chart's image
Toyo Suisan Kaisha
Price$65.06
Change+$2.67 (+4.28%)
Volume$19
Capitalization4.26B
WH Group
Price$19.20
Change+$0.12 (+0.63%)
Volume$29.15K
Capitalization6.94B
TSUKY vs WHGLY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
TSUKY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WHGLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
TSUKY vs. WHGLY commentary
Jun 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TSUKY is a StrongBuy and WHGLY is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 28, 2025
Stock price -- (TSUKY: $65.06 vs. WHGLY: $19.20)
Brand notoriety: TSUKY and WHGLY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: TSUKY: 9% vs. WHGLY: 36%
Market capitalization -- TSUKY: $4.26B vs. WHGLY: $6.94B
TSUKY [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $4.26B. WHGLY’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $6.94B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.42B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

TSUKY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWHGLY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • TSUKY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WHGLY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, WHGLY is a better buy in the long-term than TSUKY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

TSUKY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WHGLY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • TSUKY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WHGLY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both TSUKY and WHGLY are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

TSUKY (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -0.96% price change this week, while WHGLY (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was +2.61% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.17%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-0.38% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WHGLY($6.94B) has a higher market cap than TSUKY($4.26B). TSUKY has higher P/E ratio than WHGLY: TSUKY (18.73) vs WHGLY (4.96). WHGLY YTD gains are higher at: 36.128 vs. TSUKY (-7.122). TSUKY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 59.8B vs. WHGLY (3.1B). TSUKY has more cash in the bank: 186B vs. WHGLY (1.39B). TSUKY (3.75B) and WHGLY (3.9B) have identical debt. TSUKY has higher revenues than WHGLY: TSUKY (436B) vs WHGLY (28.1B).
TSUKYWHGLYTSUKY / WHGLY
Capitalization4.26B6.94B61%
EBITDA59.8B3.1B1,930%
Gain YTD-7.12236.128-20%
P/E Ratio18.734.96378%
Revenue436B28.1B1,552%
Total Cash186B1.39B13,343%
Total Debt3.75B3.9B96%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TSUKY vs WHGLY: Fundamental Ratings
TSUKY
WHGLY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
824
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
5
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6138
SMR RATING
1..100
693
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5941
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7292
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WHGLY's Valuation (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TSUKY (92). This means that WHGLY’s stock grew significantly faster than TSUKY’s over the last 12 months.

WHGLY's Profit vs Risk Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as TSUKY (61). This means that WHGLY’s stock grew similarly to TSUKY’s over the last 12 months.

TSUKY's SMR Rating (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for WHGLY (93). This means that TSUKY’s stock grew significantly faster than WHGLY’s over the last 12 months.

WHGLY's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as TSUKY (59). This means that WHGLY’s stock grew similarly to TSUKY’s over the last 12 months.

TSUKY's P/E Growth Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as WHGLY (92). This means that TSUKY’s stock grew similarly to WHGLY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
TSUKYWHGLY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
TSUKY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WHGLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FXD63.330.76
+1.21%
First Trust Cnsmr Discret AlphaDEX® ETF
IYC99.561.19
+1.21%
iShares US Consumer Discretionary ETF
FLJJ30.080.14
+0.47%
AllianzIM US Lrg Cp 6M Flr 5 Jan/Jul ETF
KOCT30.500.02
+0.06%
Innovator US Small Cap Pwr Buff ETF™ Oct
CPXR25.30-0.06
-0.23%
Uscf Daily Target 2X Copper Index ETF

TSUKY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TSUKY and TBLMF have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TSUKY and TBLMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TSUKY
1D Price
Change %
TSUKY100%
+4.28%
TBLMF - TSUKY
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VTSYF - TSUKY
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TOFB - TSUKY
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UMEWF - TSUKY
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WHGLY - TSUKY
-3%
Poorly correlated
+0.58%
More

WHGLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WHGLY and CIADY have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WHGLY and CIADY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WHGLY
1D Price
Change %
WHGLY100%
+0.58%
CIADY - WHGLY
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.78%
UVRBF - WHGLY
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TATYY - WHGLY
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.58%
TOFB - WHGLY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VTSYF - WHGLY
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More