TSRUF
Price
$7.18
Change
-$0.12 (-1.64%)
Updated
May 29 closing price
Capitalization
369.25M
UBAAF
Price
$4.68
Change
+$0.08 (+1.74%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
127.58M
Interact to see
Advertisement

TSRUF vs UBAAF

Header iconTSRUF vs UBAAF Comparison
Open Charts TSRUF vs UBAAFBanner chart's image
Pacific Current Group
Price$7.18
Change-$0.12 (-1.64%)
Volume$124
Capitalization369.25M
Urbana
Price$4.68
Change+$0.08 (+1.74%)
Volume$150
Capitalization127.58M
TSRUF vs UBAAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
TSRUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UBAAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
TSRUF vs. UBAAF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TSRUF is a Hold and UBAAF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (TSRUF: $7.18 vs. UBAAF: $4.68)
Brand notoriety: TSRUF and UBAAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: TSRUF: 55% vs. UBAAF: 2%
Market capitalization -- TSRUF: $369.25M vs. UBAAF: $127.58M
TSRUF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $369.25M. UBAAF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $127.58M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

TSRUF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileUBAAF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • TSRUF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • UBAAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, UBAAF is a better buy in the long-term than TSRUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

TSRUF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UBAAF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • TSRUF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • UBAAF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TSRUF is a better buy in the short-term than UBAAF.

Price Growth

TSRUF (@Investment Managers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while UBAAF (@Investment Managers) price change was +1.52% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.30%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.13% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TSRUF($369M) has a higher market cap than UBAAF($128M). TSRUF has higher P/E ratio than UBAAF: TSRUF (20.92) vs UBAAF (8.80). UBAAF YTD gains are higher at: 17.323 vs. TSRUF (-1.385). TSRUF has less debt than UBAAF: TSRUF (680K) vs UBAAF (36.1M). UBAAF has higher revenues than TSRUF: UBAAF (-6.33M) vs TSRUF (-14.36M).
TSRUFUBAAFTSRUF / UBAAF
Capitalization369M128M288%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-1.38517.323-8%
P/E Ratio20.928.80238%
Revenue-14.36M-6.33M227%
Total CashN/A2.05M-
Total Debt680K36.1M2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TSRUF vs UBAAF: Fundamental Ratings
TSRUF
UBAAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
37
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
711
SMR RATING
1..100
2861
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5946
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1006
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
150

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TSRUF's Valuation (26) in the null industry is in the same range as UBAAF (37). This means that TSRUF’s stock grew similarly to UBAAF’s over the last 12 months.

TSRUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the null industry is in the same range as UBAAF (11). This means that TSRUF’s stock grew similarly to UBAAF’s over the last 12 months.

TSRUF's SMR Rating (28) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UBAAF (61). This means that TSRUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than UBAAF’s over the last 12 months.

UBAAF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as TSRUF (59). This means that UBAAF’s stock grew similarly to TSRUF’s over the last 12 months.

UBAAF's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TSRUF (100). This means that UBAAF’s stock grew significantly faster than TSRUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
TSRUFUBAAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
43%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
43%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
17%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
16%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
15%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
6%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
TSRUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UBAAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LADRX20.260.30
+1.50%
Lord Abbett Developing Growth R3
RYFCX75.630.59
+0.79%
Rydex Financial Services C
PGIOX35.470.27
+0.77%
Putnam Focused Equity R
NBPTX48.810.28
+0.58%
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Value Tr
MYICX8.98N/A
N/A
NYLI WMC International Research Eq Cl C

TSRUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TSRUF and SLFPY have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TSRUF and SLFPY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TSRUF
1D Price
Change %
TSRUF100%
N/A
SLFPY - TSRUF
9%
Poorly correlated
+7.36%
UBAAF - TSRUF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WNDLF - TSRUF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SVCTF - TSRUF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SOLCF - TSRUF
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.28%
More

UBAAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that UBAAF and ADLRF have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UBAAF and ADLRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UBAAF
1D Price
Change %
UBAAF100%
N/A
ADLRF - UBAAF
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
URNAF - UBAAF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TSRUF - UBAAF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WNDLF - UBAAF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TRRPF - UBAAF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More