TSGZF
Price
$0.12
Change
+$0.01 (+9.09%)
Updated
Nov 12 closing price
Capitalization
41.44M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
UGDIF
Price
$0.15
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 12 closing price
Capitalization
42.91M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

TSGZF vs UGDIF

Header iconTSGZF vs UGDIF Comparison
Open Charts TSGZF vs UGDIFBanner chart's image
TriStar Gold
Price$0.12
Change+$0.01 (+9.09%)
Volume$7.02K
Capitalization41.44M
Unigold
Price$0.15
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$26.5K
Capitalization42.91M
TSGZF vs UGDIF Comparison Chart in %
TSGZF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UGDIF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
TSGZF vs. UGDIF commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TSGZF is a Hold and UGDIF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (TSGZF: $0.12 vs. UGDIF: $0.15)
Brand notoriety: TSGZF and UGDIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: TSGZF: 9% vs. UGDIF: 12%
Market capitalization -- TSGZF: $41.44M vs. UGDIF: $42.91M
TSGZF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $41.44M. UGDIF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $42.91M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $110.4B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

TSGZF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUGDIF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • TSGZF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • UGDIF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, UGDIF is a better buy in the long-term than TSGZF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

TSGZF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UGDIF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • TSGZF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • UGDIF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TSGZF is a better buy in the short-term than UGDIF.

Price Growth

TSGZF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +2.88% price change this week, while UGDIF (@Precious Metals) price change was +20.58% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +7.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6505.57%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+7.39% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UGDIF($42.9M) and TSGZF($41.4M) have the same market capitalization . UGDIF YTD gains are higher at: 224.524 vs. TSGZF (34.317). TSGZF (-1.8M) and UGDIF (-1.88M) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . TSGZF has more cash in the bank: 6.66M vs. UGDIF (1.52M). TSGZF (0) and UGDIF (0) have equivalent revenues.
TSGZFUGDIFTSGZF / UGDIF
Capitalization41.4M42.9M97%
EBITDA-1.8M-1.88M96%
Gain YTD34.317224.52415%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash6.66M1.52M439%
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TSGZF vs UGDIF: Fundamental Ratings
TSGZF
UGDIF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7724
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9299
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5535
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
96100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TSGZF's Valuation (76) in the null industry is in the same range as UGDIF (83). This means that TSGZF’s stock grew similarly to UGDIF’s over the last 12 months.

TSGZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as UGDIF (100). This means that TSGZF’s stock grew similarly to UGDIF’s over the last 12 months.

TSGZF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as UGDIF (99). This means that TSGZF’s stock grew similarly to UGDIF’s over the last 12 months.

UGDIF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as TSGZF (55). This means that UGDIF’s stock grew similarly to TSGZF’s over the last 12 months.

TSGZF's P/E Growth Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as UGDIF (100). This means that TSGZF’s stock grew similarly to UGDIF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
TSGZFUGDIF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
TSGZF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UGDIF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GNGXF0.230.02
+10.80%
Inventus Mining Corp.
MAARF8.460.45
+5.65%
M&A RESH INST HLDGS INC.
REDLF0.550.02
+3.58%
VAULT MINERALS LTD
IVRO0.08N/A
N/A
InVitro International
KKPNY4.51N/A
N/A
Royal KPN NV

TSGZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TSGZF and ARMN have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TSGZF and ARMN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TSGZF
1D Price
Change %
TSGZF100%
+5.15%
ARMN - TSGZF
7%
Poorly correlated
+3.38%
UGDIF - TSGZF
3%
Poorly correlated
+2.33%
USGDF - TSGZF
-3%
Poorly correlated
+2.94%
TORXF - TSGZF
-4%
Poorly correlated
+3.81%
TGMGF - TSGZF
-7%
Poorly correlated
N/A

UGDIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that UGDIF and NRRSF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UGDIF and NRRSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UGDIF
1D Price
Change %
UGDIF100%
+2.33%
NRRSF - UGDIF
20%
Poorly correlated
+5.47%
ARMN - UGDIF
7%
Poorly correlated
+3.38%
TSGZF - UGDIF
3%
Poorly correlated
+5.15%
TORXF - UGDIF
0%
Poorly correlated
+3.81%
USGDF - UGDIF
-1%
Poorly correlated
+2.94%
More