Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
TSCPX vs WCMNX
TSCPX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts TSCPX vs WCMNX
AMG TimesSquare Small Cap Growth N
Price$12.38
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets107.95M
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$14.42
Change+$0.82 (+6.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.08M
TSCPX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
TSCPX vs. WCMNX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TSCPX is a Hold and WCMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TSCPX has more cash in the bank: 108M vs. WCMNX (47.1M). TSCPX (0.00) and WCMNX (0.00) have matching dividends . TSCPX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: TSCPX (26 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than TSCPX (1.22). WCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. TSCPX (74.00). WCMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than TSCPX: WCMNX (1000) vs TSCPX (2000). WCMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.34 vs. TSCPX (-1.12). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : -6.49 vs. TSCPX (-30.99).
| TSCPX | WCMNX | TSCPX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.24 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 2.04 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.483 | 6.421 | 39% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 108M | 47.1M | 229% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.12 | 8.34 | -13% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.47 | 18.68 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | -30.99 | -6.49 | 478% |
| Returns for 10 years | -1.95 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement