Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
TSCPX vs WCMNX
TSCPX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts TSCPX vs WCMNX
AMG TimesSquare Small Cap Growth N
Price$12.33
Change-$0.02 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.92M
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$13.59
Change-$0.03 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.97M
TSCPX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
TSCPX vs. WCMNX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TSCPX is a Hold and WCMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TSCPX has more cash in the bank: 111M vs. WCMNX (43M). TSCPX (0.00) and WCMNX (0.00) have matching dividends . TSCPX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: TSCPX (26 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than TSCPX (1.22). WCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. TSCPX (74.00). WCMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than TSCPX: WCMNX (1000) vs TSCPX (2000). WCMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.42 vs. TSCPX (-3.67). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 11.12 vs. TSCPX (-21.96).
| TSCPX | WCMNX | TSCPX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.24 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 2.04 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.154 | 7.092 | 30% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 111M | 43M | 258% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.67 | 1.42 | -259% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.06 | 32.97 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | -21.96 | 11.12 | -197% |
| Returns for 10 years | -25.63 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement