Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
TSCPX vs WCMNX
TSCPX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts TSCPX vs WCMNX
AMG TimesSquare Small Cap Growth N
Price$12.80
Change+$0.17 (+1.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets113.58M
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$14.52
Change+$0.24 (+1.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.46M
TSCPX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
TSCPX vs. WCMNX commentary
Jan 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TSCPX is a Buy and WCMNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TSCPX has more cash in the bank: 114M vs. WCMNX (47.5M). TSCPX (0.00) and WCMNX (0.00) have matching dividends . TSCPX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: TSCPX (26 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than TSCPX (1.22). WCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. TSCPX (74.00). WCMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than TSCPX: WCMNX (1000) vs TSCPX (2000). WCMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.38 vs. TSCPX (4.92). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : -2.35 vs. TSCPX (-25.01).
| TSCPX | WCMNX | TSCPX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.24 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 2.04 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.960 | 7.159 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 114M | 47.5M | 240% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.92 | 12.38 | 40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.13 | 32.85 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | -25.01 | -2.35 | 1,063% |
| Returns for 10 years | -6.12 | N/A | - |