Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
TSCPX vs WCMNX
TSCPX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts TSCPX vs WCMNX
AMG TimesSquare Small Cap Growth N
Price$12.33
Change-$0.38 (-2.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets113.7M
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$13.05
Change-$0.44 (-3.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.88M
TSCPX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
TSCPX vs. WCMNX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TSCPX is a Buy and WCMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TSCPX has more cash in the bank: 114M vs. WCMNX (41.9M). TSCPX (0.00) and WCMNX (0.00) have matching dividends . TSCPX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: TSCPX (26 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than TSCPX (1.22). WCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. TSCPX (74.00). WCMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than TSCPX: WCMNX (1000) vs TSCPX (2000). WCMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.16 vs. TSCPX (-5.71). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 3.45 vs. TSCPX (-22.02).
| TSCPX | WCMNX | TSCPX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.24 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 2.04 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.302 | 6.304 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 114M | 41.9M | 272% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.71 | -3.16 | 181% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.23 | 22.08 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | -22.02 | 3.45 | -638% |
| Returns for 10 years | -23.19 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement