Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
TSCPX vs WCMLX
TSCPX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts TSCPX vs WCMLX
AMG TimesSquare Small Cap Growth N
Price$13.11
Change-$0.23 (-1.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.12M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.91
Change-$0.24 (-1.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.95M
TSCPX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
TSCPX vs. WCMLX commentary
Dec 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TSCPX is a StrongBuy and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TSCPX has more cash in the bank: 111M vs. WCMLX (44.9M). TSCPX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . TSCPX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: TSCPX (26 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than TSCPX (1.22). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. TSCPX (74.00). TSCPX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: TSCPX (2000) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.13 vs. TSCPX (-2.27). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 2.02 vs. TSCPX (-24.93).
| TSCPX | WCMLX | TSCPX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.99 | 118% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.79 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.522 | 10.031 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 111M | 44.9M | 247% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.27 | 3.13 | -72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.98 | 28.99 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | -24.93 | 2.02 | -1,235% |
| Returns for 10 years | -18.20 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement