Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
TSCPX vs WCMLX
TSCPX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts TSCPX vs WCMLX
AMG TimesSquare Small Cap Growth N
Price$12.33
Change-$0.38 (-2.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets113.7M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.25
Change-$0.44 (-3.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.88M
TSCPX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
TSCPX vs. WCMLX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TSCPX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TSCPX has more cash in the bank: 114M vs. WCMLX (41.9M). TSCPX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . TSCPX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: TSCPX (26 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than TSCPX (1.22). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. TSCPX (74.00). TSCPX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: TSCPX (2000) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.98 vs. TSCPX (-5.71). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 4.74 vs. TSCPX (-22.02).
| TSCPX | WCMLX | TSCPX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.99 | 118% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.79 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.302 | 6.454 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 114M | 41.9M | 272% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.71 | -2.98 | 192% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.23 | 22.89 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | -22.02 | 4.74 | -464% |
| Returns for 10 years | -23.19 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement