Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
TSCPX vs WCMLX
TSCPX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts TSCPX vs WCMLX
AMG TimesSquare Small Cap Growth N
Price$12.80
Change+$0.17 (+1.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets113.58M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$14.74
Change+$0.24 (+1.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.46M
TSCPX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
TSCPX vs. WCMLX commentary
Jan 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TSCPX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TSCPX has more cash in the bank: 114M vs. WCMLX (47.5M). TSCPX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . TSCPX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: TSCPX (26 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than TSCPX (1.22). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. TSCPX (74.00). TSCPX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: TSCPX (2000) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.61 vs. TSCPX (4.92). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -1.14 vs. TSCPX (-25.01).
| TSCPX | WCMLX | TSCPX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.99 | 118% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.79 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.960 | 7.122 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 114M | 47.5M | 240% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.92 | 12.61 | 39% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.13 | 33.76 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | -25.01 | -1.14 | 2,194% |
| Returns for 10 years | -6.12 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement