Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
TSCPX vs WCMLX
TSCPX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts TSCPX vs WCMLX
AMG TimesSquare Small Cap Growth N
Price$12.38
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets107.95M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$14.64
Change+$0.83 (+6.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.08M
TSCPX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
TSCPX vs. WCMLX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TSCPX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TSCPX has more cash in the bank: 108M vs. WCMLX (47.1M). TSCPX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . TSCPX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: TSCPX (26 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than TSCPX (1.22). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. TSCPX (74.00). TSCPX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: TSCPX (2000) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.52 vs. TSCPX (-1.12). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -5.30 vs. TSCPX (-30.99).
| TSCPX | WCMLX | TSCPX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.99 | 118% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.79 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.483 | 6.395 | 39% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 108M | 47.1M | 229% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.12 | 8.52 | -13% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.47 | 19.51 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | -30.99 | -5.30 | 584% |
| Returns for 10 years | -1.95 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement