TRRPF
Price
$0.44
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
15.99M
UBAAF
Price
$5.23
Change
+$0.03 (+0.58%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
217.78M
Interact to see
Advertisement

TRRPF vs UBAAF

Header iconTRRPF vs UBAAF Comparison
Open Charts TRRPF vs UBAAFBanner chart's image
Torrent Cap
Price$0.44
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.8K
Capitalization15.99M
Urbana
Price$5.23
Change+$0.03 (+0.58%)
Volume$733
Capitalization217.78M
TRRPF vs UBAAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
TRRPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UBAAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
TRRPF vs. UBAAF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TRRPF is a Hold and UBAAF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (TRRPF: $0.44 vs. UBAAF: $5.23)
Brand notoriety: TRRPF and UBAAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: TRRPF: 40% vs. UBAAF: 12%
Market capitalization -- TRRPF: $15.99M vs. UBAAF: $217.78M
TRRPF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $15.99M. UBAAF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $217.78M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $170.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.56B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

TRRPF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUBAAF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • TRRPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • UBAAF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, UBAAF is a better buy in the long-term than TRRPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

TRRPF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UBAAF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • TRRPF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • UBAAF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, UBAAF is a better buy in the short-term than TRRPF.

Price Growth

TRRPF (@Investment Managers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while UBAAF (@Investment Managers) price change was -2.32% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +38.68%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.32% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UBAAF($218M) has a higher market cap than TRRPF($16M). TRRPF (3.81) and UBAAF (3.74) have similar P/E ratio . UBAAF YTD gains are higher at: 31.111 vs. TRRPF (-1.689). UBAAF has higher revenues than TRRPF: UBAAF (92.8M) vs TRRPF (1.38M).
TRRPFUBAAFTRRPF / UBAAF
Capitalization16M218M7%
EBITDA286KN/A-
Gain YTD-1.68931.111-5%
P/E Ratio3.813.74102%
Revenue1.38M92.8M1%
Total Cash25.8MN/A-
Total DebtN/A14.9M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TRRPF vs UBAAF: Fundamental Ratings
TRRPF
UBAAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
80
Overvalued
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1009
SMR RATING
1..100
9249
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5645
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9811
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UBAAF's Valuation (25) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TRRPF (80). This means that UBAAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TRRPF’s over the last 12 months.

UBAAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TRRPF (100). This means that UBAAF’s stock grew significantly faster than TRRPF’s over the last 12 months.

UBAAF's SMR Rating (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TRRPF (92). This means that UBAAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TRRPF’s over the last 12 months.

UBAAF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as TRRPF (56). This means that UBAAF’s stock grew similarly to TRRPF’s over the last 12 months.

UBAAF's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TRRPF (98). This means that UBAAF’s stock grew significantly faster than TRRPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
TRRPFUBAAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
30%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
30%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
32%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
18%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
38%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
18%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
23%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
40%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
19%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
TRRPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UBAAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FMXUF8.50N/A
N/A
Fomento Economico Mexicano SAB
POTMF1.90N/A
N/A
Portmeirion Group PLC
TIAIY5.39N/A
N/A
Telecom Italia S.p.A.
RMDEF17.92N/A
N/A
REMEDY ENTMT OYJ
FFXDF17.60-0.15
-0.84%
Fairfax India Hldgs Corp

TRRPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TRRPF has been loosely correlated with BENF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TRRPF jumps, then BENF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TRRPF
1D Price
Change %
TRRPF100%
N/A
BENF - TRRPF
36%
Loosely correlated
+3.76%
TPVG - TRRPF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.44%
SLFPY - TRRPF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UBAAF - TRRPF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.66%
SOLCF - TRRPF
2%
Poorly correlated
-2.54%
More

UBAAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that UBAAF and ADLRF have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UBAAF and ADLRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UBAAF
1D Price
Change %
UBAAF100%
+0.66%
ADLRF - UBAAF
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
URNAF - UBAAF
7%
Poorly correlated
-1.24%
TSRUF - UBAAF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WNDLF - UBAAF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TRRPF - UBAAF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More