Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
TRQZX vs WFDRX
TRQZX vs WFDRX Comparison
Open Charts TRQZX vs WFDRX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Z
Price$103.95
Change+$0.93 (+0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets26.86B
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund - Cl R6
Price$33.61
Change+$0.31 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets941.36M
TRQZX vs WFDRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRQZX has more cash in the bank: 26.9B vs. WFDRX (941M). TRQZX pays higher dividends than WFDRX: TRQZX (0.60) vs WFDRX (0.00). TRQZX was incepted earlier than WFDRX: TRQZX (6 years) vs WFDRX (12 years). WFDRX (0.82) is less costly to investors than TRQZX (0.61). WFDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. TRQZX (22.60). TRQZX (0) and WFDRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. WFDRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.09 vs. TRQZX (-5.86). TRQZX return over 5 years is better than : 6.14 vs. WFDRX (-23.44).
| TRQZX | WFDRX | TRQZX / WFDRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 0.79 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.82 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.207 | 6.327 | 51% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 26.9B | 941M | 2,859% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.86 | -0.09 | 6,567% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.05 | 42.84 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.14 | -23.44 | -26% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 7.38 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement