Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
TRQZX vs WFDRX
TRQZX vs WFDRX Comparison
Open Charts TRQZX vs WFDRX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Z
Price$103.41
Change+$0.02 (+0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.36B
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund - Cl R6
Price$33.24
Change+$0.08 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets954.85M
TRQZX vs WFDRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRQZX has more cash in the bank: 27.4B vs. WFDRX (955M). TRQZX pays higher dividends than WFDRX: TRQZX (0.61) vs WFDRX (0.00). TRQZX was incepted earlier than WFDRX: TRQZX (5 years) vs WFDRX (12 years). WFDRX (0.82) is less costly to investors than TRQZX (0.61). WFDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. TRQZX (22.60). TRQZX (0) and WFDRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. WFDRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.07 vs. TRQZX (-3.32). TRQZX return over 5 years is better than : 4.36 vs. WFDRX (-24.21).
| TRQZX | WFDRX | TRQZX / WFDRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 0.79 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.82 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.671 | 5.157 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.4B | 955M | 2,869% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.32 | 3.07 | -108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.33 | 20.13 | 36% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.36 | -24.21 | -18% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -2.64 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers