Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
TRQZX vs WFDDX
TRQZX vs WFDDX Comparison
Open Charts TRQZX vs WFDDX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Z
Price$105.59
Change+$0.94 (+0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.6B
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund -Cl Admin
Price$29.40
Change-$0.09 (-0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets925.29M
TRQZX vs WFDDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRQZX has more cash in the bank: 25.6B vs. WFDDX (925M). TRQZX pays higher dividends than WFDDX: TRQZX (0.60) vs WFDDX (0.00). TRQZX was incepted earlier than WFDDX: TRQZX (6 years) vs WFDDX (21 years). WFDDX (1.17) is less costly to investors than TRQZX (0.61). WFDDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. TRQZX (22.60). TRQZX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFDDX: TRQZX (0) vs WFDDX (1000000). WFDDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -9.60 vs. TRQZX (-10.41). TRQZX return over 5 years is better than : -6.68 vs. WFDDX (-38.46).
| TRQZX | WFDDX | TRQZX / WFDDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 1.14 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.17 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.031 | 6.385 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 25.6B | 925M | 2,768% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.41 | -9.60 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.00 | 26.24 | 38% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.68 | -38.46 | 17% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -9.09 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement