Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
TRQZX vs WFDDX
TRQZX vs WFDDX Comparison
Open Charts TRQZX vs WFDDX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Z
Price$98.26
Change-$6.13 (-5.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.1B
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund -Cl Admin
Price$25.45
Change-$4.26 (-14.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets888.31M
TRQZX vs WFDDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
TRQZX vs. WFDDX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TRQZX is a Hold and WFDDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRQZX has more cash in the bank: 25.1B vs. WFDDX (888M). TRQZX pays higher dividends than WFDDX: TRQZX (0.74) vs WFDDX (0.00). TRQZX was incepted earlier than WFDDX: TRQZX (6 years) vs WFDDX (21 years). WFDDX (1.17) is less costly to investors than TRQZX (0.61). WFDDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. TRQZX (22.60). TRQZX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFDDX: TRQZX (0) vs WFDDX (1000000). TRQZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.09 vs. WFDDX (-11.20). TRQZX return over 5 years is better than : -13.86 vs. WFDDX (-51.31).
| TRQZX | WFDDX | TRQZX / WFDDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 1.14 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.17 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.061 | 1.800 | -3% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 25.1B | 888M | 2,827% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.74 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.09 | -11.20 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.38 | 6.53 | 36% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.86 | -51.31 | 27% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 3.71 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement