Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
TRQZX vs WFDDX
TRQZX vs WFDDX Comparison
Open Charts TRQZX vs WFDDX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Z
Price$103.28
Change-$1.40 (-1.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.86B
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund -Cl Admin
Price$28.64
Change-$1.00 (-3.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets902.57M
TRQZX vs WFDDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRQZX has more cash in the bank: 25.9B vs. WFDDX (903M). TRQZX pays higher dividends than WFDDX: TRQZX (0.60) vs WFDDX (0.00). TRQZX was incepted earlier than WFDDX: TRQZX (6 years) vs WFDDX (21 years). WFDDX (1.17) is less costly to investors than TRQZX (0.61). WFDDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. TRQZX (22.60). TRQZX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFDDX: TRQZX (0) vs WFDDX (1000000). WFDDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.03 vs. TRQZX (-8.07). TRQZX return over 5 years is better than : -3.92 vs. WFDDX (-35.72).
| TRQZX | WFDDX | TRQZX / WFDDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 1.14 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.17 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.932 | 6.926 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 25.9B | 903M | 2,868% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.07 | -7.03 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.66 | 27.98 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.92 | -35.72 | 11% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -5.58 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement