TRPCF
Price
Loading...
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Loading...
Capitalization
48.74B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WW
Price
$27.70
Change
-$0.08 (-0.29%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
276.24M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

TRPCF vs WW

Header iconTRPCF vs WW Comparison
Open Charts TRPCF vs WWBanner chart's image
Trip.com Group
PriceLoading...
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.73K
Capitalization48.74B
WW International
Price$27.70
Change-$0.08 (-0.29%)
Volume$215.65K
Capitalization276.24M
TRPCF vs WW Comparison Chart in %
TRPCF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
TRPCF vs. WW commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TRPCF is a Hold and WW is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (TRPCF: $70.98 vs. WW: $27.70)
Brand notoriety: TRPCF: Not notable vs. WW: Notable
TRPCF represents the Consumer Sundries, while WW is part of the Personnel Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: TRPCF: 159% vs. WW: 71%
Market capitalization -- TRPCF: $48.74B vs. WW: $276.24M
TRPCF [@Consumer Sundries] is valued at $48.74B. WW’s [@Personnel Services] market capitalization is $276.24M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Consumer Sundries] industry ranges from $163.61B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Personnel Services] industry ranges from $27.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Consumer Sundries] industry is $16.57B. The average market capitalization across the [@Personnel Services] industry is $2.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

TRPCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWW’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • TRPCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both TRPCF and WW are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

TRPCF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • TRPCF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

TRPCF (@Consumer Sundries) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while WW (@Personnel Services) price change was -19.41% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Consumer Sundries industry was +0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.46%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Personnel Services industry was -2.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +455.53%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Consumer Sundries (+0.01% weekly)

Consumer sundries companies make products that usually do not have another classification, such as lawn and garden products, pest-control products, pet food and pet products like leashes, collars, and harnesses. Central Garden & Pet Company and Dogness (International) Corporation are examples of companies operating in this industry.

@Personnel Services (-2.13% weekly)

Personnel Services comprise companies that provide staffing and human resources management solutions for businesses. Each company might be involved in one or more types of recruitment or employee solutions such as permanent or temporary staffing, career consulting, outsourcing, administrative services and many more. Some personnel services companies cater to large businesses, while some specialize in providing services to small/medium-sized organizations. These specialized services potentially expedite the process of getting the ‘right’ candidates and/or training them to meet the requirements of a business process. Some of the companies also cover other critical areas like internal auditing for a company. Robert Half International Inc., ManpowerGroup Inc. and Insperity, Inc. are examples of companies in the personnel services industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRPCF($48.7B) has a higher market cap than WW($276M). TRPCF has higher P/E ratio than WW: TRPCF (19.50) vs WW (2.04). WW YTD gains are higher at: 2087.402 vs. TRPCF (33.504). TRPCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 21.2B vs. WW (1.15B). TRPCF has more cash in the bank: 80B vs. WW (152M). WW has less debt than TRPCF: WW (477M) vs TRPCF (39.7B). TRPCF has higher revenues than WW: TRPCF (57.3B) vs WW (741M).
TRPCFWWTRPCF / WW
Capitalization48.7B276M17,645%
EBITDA21.2B1.15B1,837%
Gain YTD33.5042087.4022%
P/E Ratio19.502.04955%
Revenue57.3B741M7,733%
Total Cash80B152M52,632%
Total Debt39.7B477M8,323%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
WW: Fundamental Ratings
WW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
82
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
84
SMR RATING
1..100
11
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
34
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
64
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
17

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
TRPCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
28%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
25%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
23%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
TRPCF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PCM6.360.01
+0.16%
PCM Fund
EEMA95.44-0.01
-0.01%
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF
NIXT25.73-0.04
-0.17%
Research Affiliates Deletions ETF
ETEC25.70-0.13
-0.50%
iShares Breakthrough Envirtl Sol ETF
STCE78.27-3.27
-4.01%
Schwab Crypto Thematic ETF

WW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WW has been loosely correlated with MCW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WW jumps, then MCW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WW
1D Price
Change %
WW100%
-2.22%
MCW - WW
38%
Loosely correlated
+3.14%
SABR - WW
24%
Poorly correlated
-3.24%
CSV - WW
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.46%
HRB - WW
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.30%
TRPCF - WW
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More