Advertisement
TROO vs WK
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TROO is a Hold and WK is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
TROO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWK’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- TROO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- WK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
TROO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WK’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- TROO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- WK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
TROO (@Savings Banks) experienced а +6.26% price change this week, while WK (@Packaged Software) price change was +1.62% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was +2.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.32%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.86%.
Reported Earning Dates
WK is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Savings Banks (+2.73% weekly)A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.
@Packaged Software (+0.20% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| TROO | WK | TROO / WK | |
| Capitalization | 104M | 4.19B | 2% |
| EBITDA | N/A | -34.99M | - |
| Gain YTD | -48.232 | -31.735 | 152% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | N/A | 807M | - |
| Total Cash | 3.11M | 814M | 0% |
| Total Debt | 4K | 794M | 0% |
TROO | WK | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 28 | 68 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 29 Undervalued | 99 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 83 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 94 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TROO's Valuation (29) in the Miscellaneous industry is significantly better than the same rating for WK (99) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that TROO’s stock grew significantly faster than WK’s over the last 12 months.
WK's Profit vs Risk Rating (83) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as TROO (100) in the Miscellaneous industry. This means that WK’s stock grew similarly to TROO’s over the last 12 months.
TROO's SMR Rating (94) in the Miscellaneous industry is in the same range as WK (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that TROO’s stock grew similarly to WK’s over the last 12 months.
WK's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as TROO (64) in the Miscellaneous industry. This means that WK’s stock grew similarly to TROO’s over the last 12 months.
WK's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as TROO (100) in the Miscellaneous industry. This means that WK’s stock grew similarly to TROO’s over the last 12 months.
| TROO | WK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 72% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 85% | 5 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 7 days ago 67% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 67% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 90% | N/A |
Advertisement
TROO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that TROO and DH have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TROO and DH's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TROO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TROO | 100% | +4.34% | ||
| DH - TROO | 25% Poorly correlated | +1.84% | ||
| MLNK - TROO | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GRVY - TROO | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.17% | ||
| AEVA - TROO | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.36% | ||
| WK - TROO | 22% Poorly correlated | +2.51% | ||
More | ||||
WK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WK has been loosely correlated with QTWO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WK jumps, then QTWO could also see price increases.