Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
TRCLX vs WCQGX
TRCLX vs WCQGX Comparison
Open Charts TRCLX vs WCQGX
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$14.22
Change+$0.05 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets62.47M
WCM China Quality Growth Investor
Price$9.84
Change+$0.04 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.7M
TRCLX vs WCQGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
TRCLX vs. WCQGX commentary
Dec 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TRCLX is a Hold and WCQGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 62.5M vs. WCQGX (1.7M). WCQGX pays higher dividends than TRCLX: WCQGX (1.65) vs TRCLX (1.36). TRCLX was incepted earlier than WCQGX: TRCLX (6 years) vs WCQGX (6 years). WCQGX (13.45) is less costly to investors than TRCLX (2.10). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. WCQGX (74.00). WCQGX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: WCQGX (1000) vs TRCLX (500000). TRCLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.33 vs. WCQGX (11.62). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -3.69 vs. WCQGX (-34.24).
| TRCLX | WCQGX | TRCLX / WCQGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.63 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 13.45 | 16% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 34.186 | 13.689 | 250% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 1000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 62.5M | 1.7M | 3,676% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.36 | 1.65 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.33 | 11.62 | 287% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.38 | -9.41 | -280% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.69 | -34.24 | 11% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement