Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
TQSMX vs VIMAX
TQSMX vs VIMAX Comparison
Open Charts TQSMX vs VIMAX
T. Rowe Price Integrated US SMCC Eq
Price$23.81
Change-$0.11 (-0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets783.81M
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Admiral
Price$353.82
Change-$0.86 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets196.76B
TQSMX vs VIMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
TQSMX vs. VIMAX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TQSMX is a Buy and VIMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIMAX has more cash in the bank: 197B vs. TQSMX (784M). VIMAX pays higher dividends than TQSMX: VIMAX (1.49) vs TQSMX (0.55). TQSMX was incepted earlier than VIMAX: TQSMX (9 years) vs VIMAX (24 years). TQSMX (0.90) is less costly to investors than VIMAX (0.05). TQSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.60 vs. VIMAX (16.00). TQSMX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIMAX: TQSMX (2500) vs VIMAX (3000). VIMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.33 vs. TQSMX (4.03). VIMAX return over 5 years is better than : 62.28 vs. TQSMX (57.77).
| TQSMX | VIMAX | TQSMX / VIMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.05 | 1,740% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.05 | 1,800% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.261 | 8.313 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 3000 | 83% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 784M | 197B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 1.49 | 37% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.03 | 14.33 | 28% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.18 | 26.45 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.77 | 62.28 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 125.24 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement