Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
TQSAX vs VIMSX
TQSAX vs VIMSX Comparison
Open Charts TQSAX vs VIMSX
T. Rowe Price Integrated US SMCC Eq Adv
Price$24.82
Change+$0.07 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets847.66M
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Investor
Price$79.16
Change+$0.16 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets199.16B
TQSAX vs VIMSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
TQSAX vs. VIMSX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TQSAX is a Buy and VIMSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIMSX has more cash in the bank: 199B vs. TQSAX (848M). VIMSX pays higher dividends than TQSAX: VIMSX (1.35) vs TQSAX (0.34). TQSAX was incepted earlier than VIMSX: TQSAX (10 years) vs VIMSX (27 years). TQSAX (1.41) is less costly to investors than VIMSX (0.17). TQSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.60 vs. VIMSX (16.00). TQSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIMSX: TQSAX (2500) vs VIMSX (3000). VIMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.64 vs. TQSAX (9.66). TQSAX (68.95) and VIMSX (66.39) have equivalent 5 years return.
| TQSAX | VIMSX | TQSAX / VIMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.17 | 671% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.41 | 0.17 | 829% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.726 | 9.901 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 3000 | 83% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 848M | 199B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.34 | 1.35 | 25% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.66 | 16.64 | 58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.70 | 34.54 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 68.95 | 66.39 | 104% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 142.88 | - |