Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
TQSAX vs VIMAX
TQSAX vs VIMAX Comparison
Open Charts TQSAX vs VIMAX
T. Rowe Price Integrated US SMCC Eq Adv
Price$23.62
Change+$0.16 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets755.74M
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Admiral
Price$351.59
Change+$2.07 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets185.28B
TQSAX vs VIMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
TQSAX vs. VIMAX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TQSAX is a Buy and VIMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIMAX has more cash in the bank: 185B vs. TQSAX (756M). VIMAX pays higher dividends than TQSAX: VIMAX (1.52) vs TQSAX (0.35). TQSAX was incepted earlier than VIMAX: TQSAX (9 years) vs VIMAX (24 years). TQSAX (1.41) is less costly to investors than VIMAX (0.05). TQSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.60 vs. VIMAX (16.00). TQSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIMAX: TQSAX (2500) vs VIMAX (3000). VIMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.65 vs. TQSAX (6.81). VIMAX return over 5 years is better than : 73.78 vs. TQSAX (69.13).
| TQSAX | VIMAX | TQSAX / VIMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.05 | 2,280% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.41 | 0.05 | 2,820% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.421 | 7.630 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 3000 | 83% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 756M | 185B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 1.52 | 23% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.81 | 17.65 | 39% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.87 | 43.13 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 69.13 | 73.78 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 127.55 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement