Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
TQSAX vs VIMAX
TQSAX vs VIMAX Comparison
Open Charts TQSAX vs VIMAX
T. Rowe Price Integrated US SMCC Eq Adv
Price$23.77
Change-$0.11 (-0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets783.81M
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Admiral
Price$353.82
Change-$0.86 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets196.76B
TQSAX vs VIMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
TQSAX vs. VIMAX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TQSAX is a Buy and VIMAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIMAX has more cash in the bank: 197B vs. TQSAX (784M). VIMAX pays higher dividends than TQSAX: VIMAX (1.49) vs TQSAX (0.35). TQSAX was incepted earlier than VIMAX: TQSAX (9 years) vs VIMAX (24 years). TQSAX (1.41) is less costly to investors than VIMAX (0.05). TQSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.60 vs. VIMAX (16.00). TQSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIMAX: TQSAX (2500) vs VIMAX (3000). VIMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.33 vs. TQSAX (3.70). VIMAX return over 5 years is better than : 62.28 vs. TQSAX (56.00).
| TQSAX | VIMAX | TQSAX / VIMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.05 | 2,280% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.41 | 0.05 | 2,820% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.084 | 8.313 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 3000 | 83% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 784M | 197B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 1.49 | 24% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.70 | 14.33 | 26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.15 | 26.45 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.00 | 62.28 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 125.24 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement