TNEYF
Price
$4.99
Change
+$0.05 (+1.01%)
Updated
Nov 12 closing price
Capitalization
2.44B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
ZPTAF
Price
$4.98
Change
-$0.20 (-3.86%)
Updated
Nov 12 closing price
Capitalization
492.02M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

TNEYF vs ZPTAF

Header iconTNEYF vs ZPTAF Comparison
Open Charts TNEYF vs ZPTAFBanner chart's image
Tamarack Valley Energy
Price$4.99
Change+$0.05 (+1.01%)
Volume$61.73K
Capitalization2.44B
Surge Energy
Price$4.98
Change-$0.20 (-3.86%)
Volume$34.3K
Capitalization492.02M
TNEYF vs ZPTAF Comparison Chart in %
TNEYF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ZPTAF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
TNEYF vs. ZPTAF commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TNEYF is a Buy and ZPTAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (TNEYF: $4.99 vs. ZPTAF: $4.98)
Brand notoriety: TNEYF and ZPTAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: TNEYF: 214% vs. ZPTAF: 111%
Market capitalization -- TNEYF: $2.44B vs. ZPTAF: $492.02M
TNEYF [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $2.44B. ZPTAF’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $492.02M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $110.07B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $3.77B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

TNEYF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileZPTAF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • TNEYF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • ZPTAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, TNEYF is a better buy in the long-term than ZPTAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

TNEYF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZPTAF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • TNEYF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • ZPTAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TNEYF is a better buy in the short-term than ZPTAF.

Price Growth

TNEYF (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а +12.13% price change this week, while ZPTAF (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was +6.41% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +2.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.06%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (+2.66% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TNEYF($2.44B) has a higher market cap than ZPTAF($492M). ZPTAF has higher P/E ratio than TNEYF: ZPTAF (15.52) vs TNEYF (12.84). TNEYF YTD gains are higher at: 49.850 vs. ZPTAF (22.963). TNEYF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 983M vs. ZPTAF (302M). ZPTAF has more cash in the bank: 8.43M vs. TNEYF (2.76M). ZPTAF has less debt than TNEYF: ZPTAF (243M) vs TNEYF (748M). TNEYF has higher revenues than ZPTAF: TNEYF (1.74B) vs ZPTAF (635M).
TNEYFZPTAFTNEYF / ZPTAF
Capitalization2.44B492M497%
EBITDA983M302M325%
Gain YTD49.85022.963217%
P/E Ratio12.8415.5283%
Revenue1.74B635M274%
Total Cash2.76M8.43M33%
Total Debt748M243M308%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TNEYF vs ZPTAF: Fundamental Ratings
TNEYF
ZPTAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1219
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3365
SMR RATING
1..100
6478
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3845
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
273
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5014

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ZPTAF's Valuation (12) in the null industry is in the same range as TNEYF (34). This means that ZPTAF’s stock grew similarly to TNEYF’s over the last 12 months.

TNEYF's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the null industry is in the same range as ZPTAF (65). This means that TNEYF’s stock grew similarly to ZPTAF’s over the last 12 months.

TNEYF's SMR Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as ZPTAF (78). This means that TNEYF’s stock grew similarly to ZPTAF’s over the last 12 months.

TNEYF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as ZPTAF (45). This means that TNEYF’s stock grew similarly to ZPTAF’s over the last 12 months.

ZPTAF's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as TNEYF (27). This means that ZPTAF’s stock grew similarly to TNEYF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
TNEYFZPTAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
TNEYF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ZPTAF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CNGLX21.720.08
+0.37%
Commonwealth Global
VNVNX26.540.07
+0.26%
Natixis Vaughan Nelson Mid Cap N
WSTAX69.980.11
+0.16%
Macquarie Science and Technology A
FHKCX55.85N/A
N/A
Fidelity China Region
IHSRX24.64-0.11
-0.44%
Hartford Small Company R3

TNEYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TNEYF has been closely correlated with BTE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TNEYF jumps, then BTE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TNEYF
1D Price
Change %
TNEYF100%
+1.01%
BTE - TNEYF
79%
Closely correlated
+13.48%
ZPTAF - TNEYF
77%
Closely correlated
-3.86%
CDDRF - TNEYF
73%
Closely correlated
N/A
VET - TNEYF
72%
Closely correlated
-2.75%
MTDR - TNEYF
71%
Closely correlated
-1.63%
More

ZPTAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZPTAF has been closely correlated with BTE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ZPTAF jumps, then BTE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ZPTAF
1D Price
Change %
ZPTAF100%
-3.86%
BTE - ZPTAF
81%
Closely correlated
+13.48%
TNEYF - ZPTAF
79%
Closely correlated
+1.01%
VET - ZPTAF
77%
Closely correlated
-2.75%
OBE - ZPTAF
76%
Closely correlated
-2.06%
CRLFF - ZPTAF
76%
Closely correlated
-2.18%
More