TMVWF
Price
$10.10
Change
-$4.06 (-28.67%)
Updated
Aug 1 closing price
Capitalization
1.67B
ZS
Price
$273.93
Change
+$4.23 (+1.57%)
Updated
Aug 11, 11:16 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
41.99B
22 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

TMVWF vs ZS

Header iconTMVWF vs ZS Comparison
Open Charts TMVWF vs ZSBanner chart's image
TeamViewer SE
Price$10.10
Change-$4.06 (-28.67%)
Volume$200
Capitalization1.67B
Zscaler
Price$273.93
Change+$4.23 (+1.57%)
Volume$2.55K
Capitalization41.99B
TMVWF vs ZS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
TMVWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ZS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
TMVWF vs. ZS commentary
Aug 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TMVWF is a Hold and ZS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 11, 2025
Stock price -- (TMVWF: $10.10 vs. ZS: $269.70)
Brand notoriety: TMVWF: Not notable vs. ZS: Notable
TMVWF represents the Packaged Software, while ZS is part of the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: TMVWF: 1% vs. ZS: 85%
Market capitalization -- TMVWF: $1.67B vs. ZS: $41.99B
TMVWF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $1.67B. ZS’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $41.99B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $338.79B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.88T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $9.1B. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $27.18B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

TMVWF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileZS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • TMVWF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ZS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ZS is a better buy in the long-term than TMVWF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

TMVWF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • TMVWF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • ZS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TMVWF is a better buy in the short-term than ZS.

Price Growth

TMVWF (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while ZS (@Computer Communications) price change was -3.77% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.30%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +0.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +21.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +57.10%.

Reported Earning Dates

ZS is expected to report earnings on Sep 02, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-1.11% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

@Computer Communications (+0.93% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ZS($42B) has a higher market cap than TMVWF($1.67B). ZS YTD gains are higher at: 49.490 vs. TMVWF (-4.472). TMVWF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 259M vs. ZS (101M). ZS has more cash in the bank: 3.01B vs. TMVWF (139M). TMVWF has less debt than ZS: TMVWF (445M) vs ZS (1.23B). ZS has higher revenues than TMVWF: ZS (2.55B) vs TMVWF (689M).
TMVWFZSTMVWF / ZS
Capitalization1.67B42B4%
EBITDA259M101M256%
Gain YTD-4.47249.490-9%
P/E Ratio10.69N/A-
Revenue689M2.55B27%
Total Cash139M3.01B5%
Total Debt445M1.23B36%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ZS: Fundamental Ratings
ZS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
62
SMR RATING
1..100
92
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
46
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
TMVWFZS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
22%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
TMVWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ZS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HDV120.160.73
+0.61%
iShares Core High Dividend ETF
AUSF44.530.26
+0.59%
Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF
DVND33.01N/A
N/A
Touchstone Dividend Select ETF
XCCC38.53-0.01
-0.03%
BondBloxx CCC Rated USD HY Corp Bd ETF
SMBS25.27-0.05
-0.20%
Schwab® Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF

TMVWF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TMVWF and NCCGF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TMVWF and NCCGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TMVWF
1D Price
Change %
TMVWF100%
N/A
NCCGF - TMVWF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DAVE - TMVWF
22%
Poorly correlated
-4.37%
ETWO - TMVWF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ZS - TMVWF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.03%
TTD - TMVWF
21%
Poorly correlated
-38.61%
More

ZS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZS has been closely correlated with CRWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ZS jumps, then CRWD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ZS
1D Price
Change %
ZS100%
-1.03%
CRWD - ZS
68%
Closely correlated
-0.12%
PANW - ZS
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.62%
RNG - ZS
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.27%
DDOG - ZS
58%
Loosely correlated
-4.01%
NET - ZS
58%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More