Advertisement
TMOAF vs UBSFF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TMOAF is a Hold and UBSFF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
TMOAF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUBSFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- TMOAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- UBSFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
TMOAF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UBSFF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- TMOAF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
- UBSFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
TMOAF (@Packaged Software) experienced а +9.30% price change this week, while UBSFF (@Electronics/Appliances) price change was -13.90% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +2.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +49.61%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronics/Appliances industry was -0.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.77%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (+2.80% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
@Electronics/Appliances (-0.59% weekly)TVs, telephones, washing machines, home speakers and even home-office equipment like computers and printers…the list is virtually endless when it comes to consumer electronics and appliances. And, with ‘smarthomes’ increasingly becoming the reality, we could see a sharp surge in high-tech gadgets (including robotic appliances) making their way into our homes– and therefore spelling plenty opportunities in the related industries. Consumers account for 70% of US GDP, and their purchases of high-functioning electronics could make significant dents in the economy’s health. Sony Corp., Whirlpool and iRobot are some of the major consumer electronics/appliances makers.
| TMOAF | UBSFF | TMOAF / UBSFF | |
| Capitalization | 769M | 1.03B | 74% |
| EBITDA | 38.2M | 888M | 4% |
| Gain YTD | 11.549 | -47.644 | -24% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 8.13 | - |
| Revenue | 570M | 2.14B | 27% |
| Total Cash | 267M | 933M | 29% |
| Total Debt | 41.1M | 2.34B | 2% |
TMOAF | UBSFF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 96 | 12 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 72 Overvalued | 91 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 95 | 93 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | 85 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 99 | 93 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TMOAF's Valuation (72) in the null industry is in the same range as UBSFF (91). This means that TMOAF’s stock grew similarly to UBSFF’s over the last 12 months.
TMOAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as UBSFF (100). This means that TMOAF’s stock grew similarly to UBSFF’s over the last 12 months.
UBSFF's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as TMOAF (95). This means that UBSFF’s stock grew similarly to TMOAF’s over the last 12 months.
TMOAF's Price Growth Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as UBSFF (85). This means that TMOAF’s stock grew similarly to UBSFF’s over the last 12 months.
UBSFF's P/E Growth Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as TMOAF (99). This means that UBSFF’s stock grew similarly to TMOAF’s over the last 12 months.
| TMOAF | UBSFF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 24% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 21% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 39% | 2 days ago 53% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 27% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 38% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 46% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 10 days ago 58% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 23% | 2 days ago 69% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| LSHCX | 24.46 | 1.18 | +5.07% |
| Kinetics Spin-Off and Corp Rest Adv C | |||
| EQNCX | 23.96 | 0.20 | +0.84% |
| MFS Equity Income C | |||
| BGIVX | 15.92 | 0.07 | +0.47% |
| Baillie Gifford International Alpha 5 | |||
| NLSCX | 18.83 | -0.02 | -0.11% |
| Neuberger Berman Long Short C | |||
| GQHPX | 13.21 | -0.05 | -0.38% |
| GQG Partners US Quality Value Fund Inv | |||
TMOAF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TMOAF has been loosely correlated with MTC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TMOAF jumps, then MTC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TMOAF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMOAF | 100% | N/A | ||
| MTC - TMOAF | 49% Loosely correlated | -10.88% | ||
| SFSVF - TMOAF | 37% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| VASO - TMOAF | 4% Poorly correlated | +1.48% | ||
| TMSNY - TMOAF | 3% Poorly correlated | +3.10% | ||
| TMVWY - TMOAF | 3% Poorly correlated | -1.55% | ||
More | ||||
UBSFF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that UBSFF and MTHRY have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UBSFF and MTHRY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UBSFF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UBSFF | 100% | -10.40% | ||
| MTHRY - UBSFF | 26% Poorly correlated | -0.90% | ||
| GXAI - UBSFF | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.81% | ||
| FRGT - UBSFF | 20% Poorly correlated | -1.51% | ||
| VSMR - UBSFF | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TMOAF - UBSFF | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||