Advertisement
TMGEF vs UMICF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TMGEF is a Hold and UMICF is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
TMGEF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUMICF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- TMGEF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- UMICF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
TMGEF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UMICF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- TMGEF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
- UMICF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
TMGEF (@Industrial Specialties) experienced а -6.25% price change this week, while UMICF (@Environmental Services) price change was +8.81% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Specialties industry was -2.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +33.71%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was +4.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.82%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Industrial Specialties (-2.80% weekly)Companies in the industrial specialties industry process basic materials and minerals into various specialty products, such as flat and safety glass, fire retardant products, paints and coatings. Examples of companies operating in this industry are Sherwin-Williams Company, PPG Industries, Inc. and RPM International Inc.
@Environmental Services (+4.87% weekly)Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.
| TMGEF | UMICF | TMGEF / UMICF | |
| Capitalization | 15.2M | 4.79B | 0% |
| EBITDA | 1.29M | 389M | 0% |
| Gain YTD | -33.160 | 98.162 | -34% |
| P/E Ratio | 36.68 | 35.52 | 103% |
| Revenue | 30.5M | 16.1B | 0% |
| Total Cash | 5.14M | 1.11B | 0% |
| Total Debt | 2.81M | 2.87B | 0% |
TMGEF | UMICF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 70 | 29 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 79 Overvalued | 72 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 83 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 85 | 93 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | 38 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 17 | 18 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
UMICF's Valuation (72) in the null industry is in the same range as TMGEF (79). This means that UMICF’s stock grew similarly to TMGEF’s over the last 12 months.
TMGEF's Profit vs Risk Rating (83) in the null industry is in the same range as UMICF (100). This means that TMGEF’s stock grew similarly to UMICF’s over the last 12 months.
TMGEF's SMR Rating (85) in the null industry is in the same range as UMICF (93). This means that TMGEF’s stock grew similarly to UMICF’s over the last 12 months.
UMICF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as TMGEF (64). This means that UMICF’s stock grew similarly to TMGEF’s over the last 12 months.
TMGEF's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is in the same range as UMICF (18). This means that TMGEF’s stock grew similarly to UMICF’s over the last 12 months.
| TMGEF | UMICF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 60% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 58% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 60% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 73% | 8 days ago 57% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 78% | 23 days ago 65% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 56% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| RIRAX | 80.82 | 0.40 | +0.50% |
| American Funds Capital Income Bldr R1 | |||
| TEQCX | 32.06 | 0.11 | +0.34% |
| Touchstone Non-US Equity C | |||
| GSLIX | 17.60 | 0.04 | +0.23% |
| Goldman Sachs Large Cap Value Instl | |||
| PZHEX | 13.99 | 0.01 | +0.07% |
| T. Rowe Price Hedged Equity Z | |||
| FIDPX | 11.06 | N/A | N/A |
| Federated Hermes Intl Dividend Strategy | |||
TMGEF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that TMGEF and NPNVF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TMGEF and NPNVF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TMGEF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMGEF | 100% | N/A | ||
| NPNVF - TMGEF | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SOHVY - TMGEF | 10% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| UMICF - TMGEF | 4% Poorly correlated | +3.34% | ||
| SPXSF - TMGEF | 4% Poorly correlated | -0.55% | ||
| SPXSY - TMGEF | -0% Poorly correlated | +0.32% | ||
More | ||||
UMICF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UMICF has been loosely correlated with UMICY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UMICF jumps, then UMICY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UMICF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UMICF | 100% | +3.34% | ||
| UMICY - UMICF | 44% Loosely correlated | +2.86% | ||
| SMNEY - UMICF | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.65% | ||
| SKFRY - UMICF | 21% Poorly correlated | -1.40% | ||
| EPAC - UMICF | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.07% | ||
| FANUY - UMICF | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.12% | ||
More | ||||