TLSNF
Price
$3.79
Change
-$0.01 (-0.26%)
Updated
Sep 22 closing price
Capitalization
15.15B
TRAGF
Price
$0.73
Change
-$0.27 (-27.00%)
Updated
Aug 22 closing price
Capitalization
26.16M
Interact to see
Advertisement

TLSNF vs TRAGF

Header iconTLSNF vs TRAGF Comparison
Open Charts TLSNF vs TRAGFBanner chart's image
Telia Company AB
Price$3.79
Change-$0.01 (-0.26%)
Volume$202
Capitalization15.15B
Terago
Price$0.73
Change-$0.27 (-27.00%)
Volume$1.23K
Capitalization26.16M
TLSNF vs TRAGF Comparison Chart in %
TLSNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRAGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
TLSNF vs. TRAGF commentary
Oct 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TLSNF is a Hold and TRAGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 19, 2025
Stock price -- (TLSNF: $3.79 vs. TRAGF: $0.73)
Brand notoriety: TLSNF and TRAGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: TLSNF: 4% vs. TRAGF: 116%
Market capitalization -- TLSNF: $15.15B vs. TRAGF: $26.16M
TLSNF [@Major Telecommunications] is valued at $15.15B. TRAGF’s [@Major Telecommunications] market capitalization is $26.16M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Telecommunications] industry ranges from $258.09B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Telecommunications] industry is $19.8B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

TLSNF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTRAGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • TLSNF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TRAGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, TLSNF is a better buy in the long-term than TRAGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

TLSNF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TRAGF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • TLSNF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • TRAGF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TRAGF is a better buy in the short-term than TLSNF.

Price Growth

TLSNF (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TRAGF (@Major Telecommunications) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was +1.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +46.34%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Telecommunications (+1.34% weekly)

Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TLSNF($15.1B) has a higher market cap than TRAGF($26.2M). TLSNF YTD gains are higher at: 32.517 vs. TRAGF (-48.085). TLSNF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 31.1B vs. TRAGF (3.08M). TLSNF has more cash in the bank: 9.78B vs. TRAGF (1.93M). TRAGF has less debt than TLSNF: TRAGF (46.6M) vs TLSNF (90B). TLSNF has higher revenues than TRAGF: TLSNF (89.4B) vs TRAGF (25.9M).
TLSNFTRAGFTLSNF / TRAGF
Capitalization15.1B26.2M57,634%
EBITDA31.1B3.08M1,008,758%
Gain YTD32.517-48.085-68%
P/E Ratio26.41N/A-
Revenue89.4B25.9M345,174%
Total Cash9.78B1.93M507,840%
Total Debt90B46.6M193,133%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TLSNF vs TRAGF: Fundamental Ratings
TLSNF
TRAGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3740
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
95
Overvalued
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
77100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4964
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5043

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TRAGF's Valuation (89) in the null industry is in the same range as TLSNF (95). This means that TRAGF’s stock grew similarly to TLSNF’s over the last 12 months.

TRAGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as TLSNF (100). This means that TRAGF’s stock grew similarly to TLSNF’s over the last 12 months.

TLSNF's SMR Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as TRAGF (100). This means that TLSNF’s stock grew similarly to TRAGF’s over the last 12 months.

TLSNF's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as TRAGF (64). This means that TLSNF’s stock grew similarly to TRAGF’s over the last 12 months.

TLSNF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as TRAGF (100). This means that TLSNF’s stock grew similarly to TRAGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
TLSNFTRAGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
28%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
21%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
18%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
18%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
22%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
TLSNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRAGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PRF45.000.23
+0.51%
Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF
PJIO63.600.02
+0.04%
PGIM Jennison International Opps ETF
HBMBF237.00N/A
N/A
HBM Bioventures AG
NUDM38.20-0.03
-0.08%
Nuveen ESG Intl Dev Mkts Eq ETF
LTCN7.50-0.05
-0.71%
Grayscale Litecoin Trust (LTC)

TLSNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TLSNF has been loosely correlated with RCIAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TLSNF jumps, then RCIAF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TLSNF
1D Price
Change %
TLSNF100%
N/A
RCIAF - TLSNF
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PTTWF - TLSNF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TIAOF - TLSNF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TRAGF - TLSNF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TLSNY - TLSNF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.53%
More

TRAGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TRAGF and TRKNY have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TRAGF and TRKNY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TRAGF
1D Price
Change %
TRAGF100%
N/A
TRKNY - TRAGF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TIAJF - TRAGF
14%
Poorly correlated
+14.04%
TLSNF - TRAGF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TLTZF - TRAGF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TIIAY - TRAGF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.94%
More