TLGUF
Price
$16.50
Change
+$1.51 (+10.07%)
Updated
Jul 21 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
TREE
Price
$49.06
Change
-$1.28 (-2.54%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
664.04M
4 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

TLGUF vs TREE

Header iconTLGUF vs TREE Comparison
Open Charts TLGUF vs TREEBanner chart's image
TLGY Acquisition
Price$16.50
Change+$1.51 (+10.07%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
LendingTree
Price$49.06
Change-$1.28 (-2.54%)
Volume$462.24K
Capitalization664.04M
TLGUF vs TREE Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
TLGUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TREE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
TLGUF vs. TREE commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TLGUF is a Hold and TREE is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (TLGUF: $16.50 vs. TREE: $49.06)
Brand notoriety: TLGUF and TREE are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: TLGUF: 100% vs. TREE: 159%
Market capitalization -- TLGUF: $0 vs. TREE: $664.04M
TLGUF [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $0. TREE’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $664.04M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $4.56B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

TLGUF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTREE’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • TLGUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TREE’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, TLGUF is a better buy in the long-term than TREE.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

TLGUF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TREE’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • TLGUF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • TREE’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TREE is a better buy in the short-term than TLGUF.

Price Growth

TLGUF (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +10.07% price change this week, while TREE (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +29.34% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +82.89%.

Reported Earning Dates

TREE is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+0.43% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TLGUF YTD gains are higher at: 33.172 vs. TREE (26.606). TREE has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 74.2M vs. TLGUF (-1.73M). TREE has more cash in the bank: 126M vs. TLGUF (40.6K). TLGUF has less debt than TREE: TLGUF (1.29M) vs TREE (567M). TREE has higher revenues than TLGUF: TREE (972M) vs TLGUF (0).
TLGUFTREETLGUF / TREE
CapitalizationN/A664M-
EBITDA-1.73M74.2M-2%
Gain YTD33.17226.606125%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0972M-
Total Cash40.6K126M0%
Total Debt1.29M567M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TREE: Fundamental Ratings
TREE
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
45
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
97
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
44
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
TLGUFTREE
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
7%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
4%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
14%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
15%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
TLGUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TREE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FICIX14.350.12
+0.84%
Cantor Fitzgerald Large Cap Fcs Cl R6
IRLSX78.800.34
+0.43%
Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Idx Port S
RYSOX96.610.38
+0.39%
Rydex S&P 500 A
LEGAX77.160.30
+0.39%
Columbia Large Cap Growth A
ZIFIX11.97-0.03
-0.25%
American Beacon Ninety One Int Frn R5

TLGUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TLGUF has been loosely correlated with ISRLU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TLGUF jumps, then ISRLU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TLGUF
1D Price
Change %
TLGUF100%
N/A
ISRLU - TLGUF
40%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CSLUF - TLGUF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EONR - TLGUF
27%
Poorly correlated
+2.95%
TREE - TLGUF
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.54%
SVIIU - TLGUF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

TREE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TREE has been loosely correlated with HTH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TREE jumps, then HTH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TREE
1D Price
Change %
TREE100%
-2.54%
HTH - TREE
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.29%
VOYA - TREE
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.08%
IX - TREE
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.39%
TLGUF - TREE
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ATMCU - TREE
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More