Advertisement
TLGPY vs TLTZF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TLGPY is a Hold and TLTZF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
TLGPY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTLTZF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- TLGPY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- TLTZF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
TLGPY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TLTZF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- TLGPY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- TLTZF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
TLGPY (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а -0.38% price change this week, while TLTZF (@Major Telecommunications) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was +1.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +46.34%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Major Telecommunications (+1.34% weekly)Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.
| TLGPY | TLTZF | TLGPY / TLTZF | |
| Capitalization | 35.8B | 11.6B | 309% |
| EBITDA | 8.58B | 12.3B | 70% |
| Gain YTD | 32.133 | 41.739 | 77% |
| P/E Ratio | 25.72 | 25.96 | 99% |
| Revenue | 22.7B | 29.6B | 77% |
| Total Cash | 1.01B | 253M | 400% |
| Total Debt | 18B | 29.9B | 60% |
TLGPY | TLTZF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 57 | 90 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 47 Fair valued | 78 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 30 | 80 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | 43 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | 31 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TLGPY's Valuation (47) in the null industry is in the same range as TLTZF (78). This means that TLGPY’s stock grew similarly to TLTZF’s over the last 12 months.
TLGPY's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TLTZF (80). This means that TLGPY’s stock grew somewhat faster than TLTZF’s over the last 12 months.
TLTZF's SMR Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TLGPY (98). This means that TLTZF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TLGPY’s over the last 12 months.
TLTZF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as TLGPY (53). This means that TLTZF’s stock grew similarly to TLGPY’s over the last 12 months.
TLTZF's P/E Growth Rating (31) in the null industry is in the same range as TLGPY (55). This means that TLTZF’s stock grew similarly to TLGPY’s over the last 12 months.
| TLGPY | TLTZF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 32% | 2 days ago 31% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 6 days ago 37% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 36% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | 6 days ago 25% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 36% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 21% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 25 days ago 54% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 40% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 32% |
Advertisement
TLGPY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TLGPY has been loosely correlated with SFTBY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TLGPY jumps, then SFTBY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TLGPY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TLGPY | 100% | +0.09% | ||
| SFTBY - TLGPY | 38% Loosely correlated | +0.35% | ||
| KT - TLGPY | 37% Loosely correlated | -1.09% | ||
| SOBKY - TLGPY | 35% Loosely correlated | +0.84% | ||
| LBTYK - TLGPY | 35% Loosely correlated | +0.91% | ||
| LBTYA - TLGPY | 35% Loosely correlated | +1.85% | ||
More | ||||
TLTZF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that TLTZF and TTRAF have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TLTZF and TTRAF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TLTZF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TLTZF | 100% | N/A | ||
| TTRAF - TLTZF | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TLGPY - TLTZF | 5% Poorly correlated | +0.09% | ||
| TRAGF - TLTZF | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TIAOF - TLTZF | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TIAJF - TLTZF | 1% Poorly correlated | +14.04% | ||
More | ||||