TLF
Price
$4.19
Change
-$0.01 (-0.24%)
Updated
Nov 15, 10:30 AM (EDT)
VRM
Price
$5.34
Change
-$1.22 (-18.60%)
Updated
Nov 15, 03:42 PM (EDT)
Ad is loading...

TLF vs VRM

Header iconTLF vs VRM Comparison
Open Charts TLF vs VRMBanner chart's image
Tandy Leather Factory
Price$4.19
Change-$0.01 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Vroom
Price$5.34
Change-$1.22 (-18.60%)
Volume$400
CapitalizationN/A
TLF vs VRM Comparison Chart
Loading...
VRM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
TLF vs. VRM commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TLF is a Hold and VRM is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (TLF: $4.20 vs. VRM: $6.56)
Brand notoriety: TLF and VRM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: TLF: 32% vs. VRM: 173%
Market capitalization -- TLF: $39.06M vs. VRM: $24.1M
TLF [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $39.06M. VRM’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $24.1M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $8.67B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

TLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileVRM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • TLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • VRM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both TLF and VRM are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

VRM’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • VRM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

TLF (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -0.24% price change this week, while VRM (@Specialty Stores) price change was -28.62% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +1.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.66%.

Reported Earning Dates

TLF is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2024.

VRM is expected to report earnings on May 13, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (+1.18% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TLF($39.1M) has a higher market cap than VRM($24.1M). VRM has higher P/E ratio than TLF: VRM (13.28) vs TLF (10.33). TLF YTD gains are higher at: -1.408 vs. VRM (-86.390). TLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 9.04M vs. VRM (-276M). VRM has more cash in the bank: 140M vs. TLF (12.2M). TLF has less debt than VRM: TLF (9.43M) vs VRM (1.23B). VRM has higher revenues than TLF: VRM (893M) vs TLF (76.2M).
TLFVRMTLF / VRM
Capitalization39.1M24.1M162%
EBITDA9.04M-276M-3%
Gain YTD-1.408-86.3902%
P/E Ratio10.3313.2878%
Revenue76.2M893M9%
Total Cash12.2M140M9%
Total Debt9.43M1.23B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TLF: Fundamental Ratings
TLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
89
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
52
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
80
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
57
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
87
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
VRM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
VRM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

TLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TLF and CANG have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TLF and CANG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TLF
1D Price
Change %
TLF100%
N/A
CANG - TLF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.81%
MNSO - TLF
14%
Poorly correlated
-6.35%
SNROF - TLF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ACVA - TLF
7%
Poorly correlated
-1.72%
VRM - TLF
6%
Poorly correlated
-10.14%
More

VRM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VRM has been loosely correlated with CVNA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VRM jumps, then CVNA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VRM
1D Price
Change %
VRM100%
-10.14%
CVNA - VRM
33%
Loosely correlated
+0.19%
WSM - VRM
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.01%
HVT - VRM
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.31%
GPI - VRM
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.53%
RH - VRM
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.14%
More