TKCBY
Price
Loading...
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Loading...
Capitalization
1.34B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TYNPF
Price
$30.70
Change
-$0.85 (-2.69%)
Updated
Dec 11 closing price
Capitalization
13.05B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

TKCBY vs TYNPF

Header iconTKCBY vs TYNPF Comparison
Open Charts TKCBY vs TYNPFBanner chart's image
Tokai Carbon
PriceLoading...
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$172
Capitalization1.34B
Nippon Sanso Holdings
Price$30.70
Change-$0.85 (-2.69%)
Volume$4.19K
Capitalization13.05B
TKCBY vs TYNPF Comparison Chart in %
TKCBY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TYNPF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
TKCBY vs. TYNPF commentary
Dec 13, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TKCBY is a Hold and TYNPF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 13, 2025
Stock price -- (TKCBY: $22.95 vs. TYNPF: $30.70)
Brand notoriety: TKCBY and TYNPF are both not notable
TKCBY represents the Chemicals: Specialty, while TYNPF is part of the Chemicals: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: TKCBY: 100% vs. TYNPF: 233%
Market capitalization -- TKCBY: $1.34B vs. TYNPF: $13.05B
TKCBY [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $1.34B. TYNPF’s [@Chemicals: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $13.05B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $188.32B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $56.05B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $8.37B. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Major Diversified] industry is $6.59B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

TKCBY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTYNPF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • TKCBY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TYNPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, TYNPF is a better buy in the long-term than TKCBY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

TKCBY’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TYNPF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • TKCBY’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • TYNPF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TKCBY is a better buy in the short-term than TYNPF.

Price Growth

TKCBY (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TYNPF (@Chemicals: Major Diversified) price change was -0.58% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was -0.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.82%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Major Diversified industry was -0.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.20%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (-0.05% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

@Chemicals: Major Diversified (-0.54% weekly)

The major diversified chemicals industry includes companies that produce a wide range of chemicals and industrial gases. The products are often used as raw materials in the manufacturing of various types of goods, including plastics, paints, carpets, and fixtures to name a few. Major companies making diversified chemicals include DuPont de Nemours Inc., Celanese Corporation, Celanese Corporation and Westlake Chemical Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TYNPF($13B) has a higher market cap than TKCBY($1.34B). TYNPF (19.35) and TKCBY (18.49) have similar P/E ratio . TYNPF (5.130) and TKCBY (5.034) have similar YTD gains . TYNPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 292B vs. TKCBY (-5.7B). TYNPF has more cash in the bank: 150B vs. TKCBY (72.2B). TKCBY has less debt than TYNPF: TKCBY (199B) vs TYNPF (872B). TYNPF has higher revenues than TKCBY: TYNPF (1.29T) vs TKCBY (337B).
TKCBYTYNPFTKCBY / TYNPF
Capitalization1.34B13B10%
EBITDA-5.7B292B-2%
Gain YTD5.0345.13098%
P/E Ratio18.4919.3596%
Revenue337B1.29T26%
Total Cash72.2B150B48%
Total Debt199B872B23%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TKCBY: Fundamental Ratings
TKCBY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
44
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
97
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
56
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
TKCBYTYNPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
17%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
7%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
6%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
56%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
TKCBY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TYNPF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TMET30.850.54
+1.79%
iShares Transition-Enabling Metals ETF
EAGL32.660.16
+0.49%
Eagle Capital Select Equity ETF
USAF27.490.12
+0.42%
Atlas America Fund
SNOV25.000.10
+0.39%
FT Vest U.S. Sm Cp Mod Buf ETF -Nov
HYBB47.120.01
+0.03%
iShares BB Rated Corporate Bond ETF

TKCBY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TKCBY and TKCBF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TKCBY and TKCBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TKCBY
1D Price
Change %
TKCBY100%
N/A
TKCBF - TKCBY
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FF - TKCBY
22%
Poorly correlated
+8.81%
MTLHY - TKCBY
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.97%
SCL - TKCBY
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.71%
SYIEF - TKCBY
12%
Poorly correlated
+1.05%
More

TYNPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TYNPF and CBT have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TYNPF and CBT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TYNPF
1D Price
Change %
TYNPF100%
-2.68%
CBT - TYNPF
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.03%
OEC - TYNPF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.96%
AVNT - TYNPF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.25%
TROX - TYNPF
22%
Poorly correlated
+4.87%
SKFOF - TYNPF
22%
Poorly correlated
+3.76%
More