Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
TINY vs XLK
TINY vs XLK Comparison
Open Charts TINY vs XLK
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF
Price$54.00
Change+$1.00 (+1.89%)
Volume$423
Net Assets5.39M
State Street®TechSelSectSPDR®ETF
Price$146.53
Change+$0.23 (+0.16%)
Volume$5.05M
Net Assets94.35B
TINY vs XLK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
TINY vs. XLK commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TINY is a Buy and XLK is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XLK has more net assets: 94.3B vs. TINY (5.39M). XLK has a higher annual dividend yield than TINY: XLK (26.629) vs TINY (20.930). TINY was incepted earlier than XLK: TINY (4 years) vs XLK (27 years). XLK (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than TINY (0.58). TINY has a higher turnover XLK (5.00) vs XLK (5.00).
| TINY | XLK | TINY / XLK | |
| Gain YTD | 20.930 | 26.629 | 79% |
| Net Assets | 5.39M | 94.3B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.08 | 725% |
| Turnover | 45.00 | 5.00 | 900% |
| Yield | 0.19 | 0.53 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 27 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| TINY | XLK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 13 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
TINY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TINY has been loosely correlated with UCTT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TINY jumps, then UCTT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TINY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TINY | 100% | +3.28% | ||
| UCTT - TINY | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.53% | ||
| LRCX - TINY | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.42% | ||
| TSM - TINY | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.35% | ||
| KLAC - TINY | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.20% | ||
| AMAT - TINY | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.43% | ||
More | ||||
XLK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XLK has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XLK jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XLK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XLK | 100% | +0.16% | ||
| NVDA - XLK | 84% Closely correlated | +1.02% | ||
| LRCX - XLK | 81% Closely correlated | +0.42% | ||
| MPWR - XLK | 80% Closely correlated | -0.73% | ||
| KLAC - XLK | 79% Closely correlated | +0.20% | ||
| TRMB - XLK | 79% Closely correlated | +0.24% | ||
More | ||||