Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
TINY vs XLK
TINY vs XLK Comparison
Open Charts TINY vs XLK
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF
Price$44.34
Change-$0.53 (-1.18%)
Volume$250
Net Assets4.42M
The Technology Select Sector SPDR® ETF
Price$262.86
Change+$0.22 (+0.08%)
Volume$19.28M
Net Assets84.04B
TINY vs XLK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
TINY vs. XLK commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TINY is a Hold and XLK is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XLK has more net assets: 84B vs. TINY (4.42M). XLK has a higher annual dividend yield than TINY: XLK (13.434) vs TINY (-0.870). TINY was incepted earlier than XLK: TINY (4 years) vs XLK (27 years). XLK (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than TINY (0.58). TINY has a higher turnover XLK (39.00) vs XLK (39.00).
| TINY | XLK | TINY / XLK | |
| Gain YTD | -0.870 | 13.434 | -6% |
| Net Assets | 4.42M | 84B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.08 | 725% |
| Turnover | 42.00 | 39.00 | 108% |
| Yield | 0.06 | 0.59 | 9% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 27 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| TINY | XLK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 6 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 6 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
TINY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TINY has been loosely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TINY jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TINY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TINY | 100% | -1.19% | ||
| LRCX - TINY | 65% Loosely correlated | +2.52% | ||
| UCTT - TINY | 65% Loosely correlated | +2.05% | ||
| KLAC - TINY | 65% Loosely correlated | +3.64% | ||
| AMAT - TINY | 63% Loosely correlated | +2.85% | ||
| ENTG - TINY | 62% Loosely correlated | +2.93% | ||
More | ||||
XLK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XLK has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XLK jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XLK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XLK | 100% | +0.08% | ||
| NVDA - XLK | 85% Closely correlated | -2.70% | ||
| LRCX - XLK | 80% Closely correlated | +2.52% | ||
| APH - XLK | 79% Closely correlated | -2.04% | ||
| AMD - XLK | 78% Closely correlated | -6.58% | ||
| KLAC - XLK | 78% Closely correlated | +3.64% | ||
More | ||||