THQQF
Price
$2.45
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
TMSNY
Price
$67.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
Ad is loading...

THQQF vs TMSNY

Header iconTHQQF vs TMSNY Comparison
Open Charts THQQF vs TMSNYBanner chart's image
Embracer Group AB
Price$2.45
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$500
CapitalizationN/A
Temenos AG
Price$67.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$3.32K
CapitalizationN/A
THQQF vs TMSNY Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
THQQF vs. TMSNY commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is THQQF is a Hold and TMSNY is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (THQQF: $2.45 vs. TMSNY: $67.05)
Brand notoriety: THQQF and TMSNY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: THQQF: 6% vs. TMSNY: 68%
Market capitalization -- THQQF: $3.85B vs. TMSNY: $6.18B
THQQF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $3.85B. TMSNY’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $6.18B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

THQQF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTMSNY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • THQQF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TMSNY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TMSNY is a better buy in the long-term than THQQF.

Price Growth

THQQF (@Packaged Software) experienced а -12.07% price change this week, while TMSNY (@Packaged Software) price change was -1.92% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.48%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-1.61% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TMSNY($6.18B) has a higher market cap than THQQF($3.85B). TMSNY has higher P/E ratio than THQQF: TMSNY (52.36) vs THQQF (7.33). THQQF YTD gains are higher at: -9.544 vs. TMSNY (-26.507). THQQF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 12.5B vs. TMSNY (311M). THQQF has more cash in the bank: 4.68B vs. TMSNY (112M). TMSNY has less debt than THQQF: TMSNY (841M) vs THQQF (21.7B). THQQF has higher revenues than TMSNY: THQQF (37.7B) vs TMSNY (955M).
THQQFTMSNYTHQQF / TMSNY
Capitalization3.85B6.18B62%
EBITDA12.5B311M4,019%
Gain YTD-9.544-26.50736%
P/E Ratio7.3352.3614%
Revenue37.7B955M3,948%
Total Cash4.68B112M4,179%
Total Debt21.7B841M2,580%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TMSNY: Fundamental Ratings
TMSNY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
57
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
46
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
57
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
79
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

THQQF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that THQQF and DAVA have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that THQQF and DAVA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To THQQF
1D Price
Change %
THQQF100%
N/A
DAVA - THQQF
29%
Poorly correlated
-3.94%
TMICY - THQQF
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.34%
EB - THQQF
23%
Poorly correlated
+4.74%
TMSNY - THQQF
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.22%
UBSFF - THQQF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

TMSNY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TMSNY has been loosely correlated with DAVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TMSNY jumps, then DAVA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TMSNY
1D Price
Change %
TMSNY100%
-3.22%
DAVA - TMSNY
56%
Loosely correlated
-3.94%
SNOW - TMSNY
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.12%
LPSN - TMSNY
40%
Loosely correlated
-6.35%
EVTC - TMSNY
37%
Loosely correlated
-1.77%
EB - TMSNY
36%
Loosely correlated
+4.74%
More