THLPF
Price
$29.20
Change
+$1.48 (+5.34%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
2.94B
YAMCF
Price
$6.66
Change
-$0.37 (-5.26%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
3.06B
Interact to see
Advertisement

THLPF vs YAMCF

Header iconTHLPF vs YAMCF Comparison
Open Charts THLPF vs YAMCFBanner chart's image
Thule Group AB
Price$29.20
Change+$1.48 (+5.34%)
Volume$573
Capitalization2.94B
Yamaha
Price$6.66
Change-$0.37 (-5.26%)
Volume$251
Capitalization3.06B
THLPF vs YAMCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
THLPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
YAMCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
THLPF vs. YAMCF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is THLPF is a Hold and YAMCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (THLPF: $29.20 vs. YAMCF: $6.66)
Brand notoriety: THLPF and YAMCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Recreational Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: THLPF: 106% vs. YAMCF: 67%
Market capitalization -- THLPF: $2.94B vs. YAMCF: $3.06B
THLPF [@Recreational Products] is valued at $2.94B. YAMCF’s [@Recreational Products] market capitalization is $3.06B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Recreational Products] industry ranges from $40.3B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Recreational Products] industry is $4.91B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

THLPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileYAMCF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • THLPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • YAMCF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, THLPF is a better buy in the long-term than YAMCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

THLPF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while YAMCF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • THLPF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • YAMCF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, THLPF is a better buy in the short-term than YAMCF.

Price Growth

THLPF (@Recreational Products) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while YAMCF (@Recreational Products) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was +3.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +31.26%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Recreational Products (+3.18% weekly)

The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
YAMCF($3.06B) and THLPF($2.94B) have the same market capitalization . YAMCF has higher P/E ratio than THLPF: YAMCF (35.74) vs THLPF (28.41). YAMCF YTD gains are higher at: -4.563 vs. THLPF (-8.750). YAMCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 52.5B vs. THLPF (1.57B). YAMCF has more cash in the bank: 122B vs. THLPF (357M). THLPF has less debt than YAMCF: THLPF (4.48B) vs YAMCF (17.2B). YAMCF has higher revenues than THLPF: YAMCF (471B) vs THLPF (10.1B).
THLPFYAMCFTHLPF / YAMCF
Capitalization2.94B3.06B96%
EBITDA1.57B52.5B3%
Gain YTD-8.750-4.563192%
P/E Ratio28.4135.7479%
Revenue10.1B471B2%
Total Cash357M122B0%
Total Debt4.48B17.2B26%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
THLPF vs YAMCF: Fundamental Ratings
THLPF
YAMCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
23
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
88100
SMR RATING
1..100
5498
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6379
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4110
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

THLPF's Valuation (20) in the null industry is in the same range as YAMCF (23). This means that THLPF’s stock grew similarly to YAMCF’s over the last 12 months.

THLPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as YAMCF (100). This means that THLPF’s stock grew similarly to YAMCF’s over the last 12 months.

THLPF's SMR Rating (54) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for YAMCF (98). This means that THLPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than YAMCF’s over the last 12 months.

THLPF's Price Growth Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as YAMCF (79). This means that THLPF’s stock grew similarly to YAMCF’s over the last 12 months.

YAMCF's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is in the same range as THLPF (41). This means that YAMCF’s stock grew similarly to THLPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
THLPFYAMCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
33%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
31%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
35%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
35%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
19%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
26%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
10%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
33%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
THLPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
YAMCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SAGCX36.780.28
+0.77%
ClearBridge Growth C
VSCPX353.492.47
+0.70%
Vanguard Small Cap Index InstlPlus
QSERX19.380.02
+0.10%
AQR Small Cap Multi-Style R6
UGOFX12.31N/A
N/A
Victory Global Managed Volatility Instl
QCERX21.68-0.05
-0.23%
AQR Large Cap Multi-Style R6

THLPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that THLPF and GBBYF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that THLPF and GBBYF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To THLPF
1D Price
Change %
THLPF100%
N/A
GBBYF - THLPF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SHMDF - THLPF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SMNNY - THLPF
0%
Poorly correlated
+0.53%
YAMCF - THLPF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PYHOF - THLPF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

YAMCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that YAMCF and GDHG have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that YAMCF and GDHG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To YAMCF
1D Price
Change %
YAMCF100%
N/A
GDHG - YAMCF
25%
Poorly correlated
-3.72%
SMNNY - YAMCF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.53%
THLPF - YAMCF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
THUPY - YAMCF
-2%
Poorly correlated
+5.27%
PMTYF - YAMCF
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More