THC vs UHS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is THC is a Hold and UHS is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
THC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileUHS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- THC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- UHS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
THC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UHS’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).
- THC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
- UHS’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 7 bearish.
Price Growth
THC (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а +1.60% price change this week, while UHS (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was -0.38% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -2.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1650.69%.
Reported Earning Dates
THC is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.
UHS is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Medical/Nursing Services (-2.23% weekly)The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
| THC | UHS | THC / UHS | |
| Capitalization | 10.4B | 12.3B | 85% |
| EBITDA | 3.39B | 1.71B | 198% |
| Gain YTD | 115.601 | 33.420 | 346% |
| P/E Ratio | 18.28 | 17.13 | 107% |
| Revenue | 20.5B | 14.3B | 143% |
| Total Cash | 1.23B | 119M | 1,032% |
| Total Debt | 15B | 5.37B | 279% |
THC | UHS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 7 | 12 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 70 Overvalued | 35 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 9 | 43 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 12 | 64 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 49 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 97 | 71 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 16 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
UHS's Valuation (35) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is somewhat better than the same rating for THC (70). This means that UHS’s stock grew somewhat faster than THC’s over the last 12 months.
THC's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UHS (43). This means that THC’s stock grew somewhat faster than UHS’s over the last 12 months.
THC's SMR Rating (12) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UHS (64). This means that THC’s stock grew somewhat faster than UHS’s over the last 12 months.
THC's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is in the same range as UHS (49). This means that THC’s stock grew similarly to UHS’s over the last 12 months.
UHS's P/E Growth Rating (71) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is in the same range as THC (97). This means that UHS’s stock grew similarly to THC’s over the last 12 months.
| THC | UHS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 65% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 64% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 71% |
THC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, THC has been loosely correlated with SGRY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if THC jumps, then SGRY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To THC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| THC | 100% | -0.78% | ||
| SGRY - THC | 51% Loosely correlated | -13.75% | ||
| USPH - THC | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.25% | ||
| DVA - THC | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.48% | ||
| CYH - THC | 35% Loosely correlated | -4.27% | ||
| UHS - THC | 32% Poorly correlated | -1.21% | ||
More | ||||
UHS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UHS has been closely correlated with HCA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UHS jumps, then HCA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UHS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UHS | 100% | -1.21% | ||
| HCA - UHS | 75% Closely correlated | -0.35% | ||
| EHC - UHS | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.08% | ||
| ASTH - UHS | 36% Loosely correlated | -2.33% | ||
| SEM - UHS | 33% Poorly correlated | -2.21% | ||
| ENSG - UHS | 32% Poorly correlated | -0.21% | ||
More | ||||