TGMGF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.03 (-33.33%)
Updated
Dec 5 closing price
UGDIF
Price
$0.05
Change
+$0.01 (+25.00%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
Ad is loading...

TGMGF vs UGDIF

Header iconTGMGF vs UGDIF Comparison
Open Charts TGMGF vs UGDIFBanner chart's image
Theta Gold Mines
Price$0.06
Change-$0.03 (-33.33%)
Volume$3.5K
CapitalizationN/A
Unigold
Price$0.05
Change+$0.01 (+25.00%)
Volume$100K
CapitalizationN/A
TGMGF vs UGDIF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
TGMGF vs. UGDIF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TGMGF is a Hold and UGDIF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (TGMGF: $0.06 vs. UGDIF: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: TGMGF and UGDIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: TGMGF: 65% vs. UGDIF: 152%
Market capitalization -- TGMGF: $51.29M vs. UGDIF: $11.57M
TGMGF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $51.29M. UGDIF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $11.57M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

TGMGF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUGDIF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • TGMGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • UGDIF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, UGDIF is a better buy in the long-term than TGMGF.

Price Growth

TGMGF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while UGDIF (@Precious Metals) price change was +8.34% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -3.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.54%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-3.68% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TGMGF($51.3M) has a higher market cap than UGDIF($11.6M). UGDIF YTD gains are higher at: 13.585 vs. TGMGF (-28.093). TGMGF (-5.11M) and UGDIF (-5.25M) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . UGDIF has more cash in the bank: 243K vs. TGMGF (147K). TGMGF (5.88M) and UGDIF (6.08M) have identical debt. TGMGF has higher revenues than UGDIF: TGMGF (7.12M) vs UGDIF (0).
TGMGFUGDIFTGMGF / UGDIF
Capitalization51.3M11.6M442%
EBITDA-5.11M-5.25M97%
Gain YTD-28.09313.585-207%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue7.12M0-
Total Cash147K243K60%
Total Debt5.88M6.08M97%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
UGDIF: Fundamental Ratings
UGDIF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
91
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
47
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME31.261.82
+6.18%
GameStop Corp
TSLA479.8616.84
+3.64%
Tesla
AAPL253.482.44
+0.97%
Apple
BTC.X106140.600000110.890625
+0.10%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY604.29-2.50
-0.41%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust

TGMGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TGMGF and WPM have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TGMGF and WPM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TGMGF
1D Price
Change %
TGMGF100%
N/A
WPM - TGMGF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.43%
TSDRF - TGMGF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TGLDF - TGMGF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UGDIF - TGMGF
6%
Poorly correlated
+19.05%
ARMN - TGMGF
1%
Poorly correlated
+2.16%
More

UGDIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that UGDIF and TSGZF have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UGDIF and TSGZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UGDIF
1D Price
Change %
UGDIF100%
+19.05%
TSGZF - UGDIF
7%
Poorly correlated
-14.67%
ARMN - UGDIF
7%
Poorly correlated
+2.16%
TSDRF - UGDIF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TGMGF - UGDIF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TEUTF - UGDIF
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.09%
More