TGMGF
Price
$0.11
Change
-$0.05 (-31.25%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
163.41M
TSGZF
Price
$0.12
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
42.14M
Interact to see
Advertisement

TGMGF vs TSGZF

Header iconTGMGF vs TSGZF Comparison
Open Charts TGMGF vs TSGZFBanner chart's image
Theta Gold Mines
Price$0.11
Change-$0.05 (-31.25%)
Volume$1.5K
Capitalization163.41M
TriStar Gold
Price$0.12
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$185.96K
Capitalization42.14M
TGMGF vs TSGZF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
TGMGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TSGZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
TGMGF vs. TSGZF commentary
Sep 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TGMGF is a Hold and TSGZF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 25, 2025
Stock price -- (TGMGF: $0.11 vs. TSGZF: $0.12)
Brand notoriety: TGMGF and TSGZF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: TGMGF: 30% vs. TSGZF: 166%
Market capitalization -- TGMGF: $163.41M vs. TSGZF: $42.14M
TGMGF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $163.41M. TSGZF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $42.14M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $97.6B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

TGMGF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTSGZF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • TGMGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TSGZF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, TGMGF is a better buy in the long-term than TSGZF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

TGMGF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TSGZF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • TGMGF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TSGZF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TSGZF is a better buy in the short-term than TGMGF.

Price Growth

TGMGF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -61.23% price change this week, while TSGZF (@Precious Metals) price change was +1.08% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +5.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +30.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6063.27%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+5.35% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TGMGF($163M) has a higher market cap than TSGZF($42.1M). TGMGF YTD gains are higher at: 43.675 vs. TSGZF (32.111). TSGZF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.8M vs. TGMGF (-10.89M).
TGMGFTSGZFTGMGF / TSGZF
Capitalization163M42.1M387%
EBITDA-10.89M-1.8M605%
Gain YTD43.67532.111136%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/A0-
Total CashN/A6.66M-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TSGZF: Fundamental Ratings
TSGZF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
54
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
93
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
83
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
96
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
TGMGFTSGZF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
TGMGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TSGZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WWLAX14.230.01
+0.07%
Westwood Quality Value Fund A
HFQAX7.07N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income A
FAPJX13.55N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Healthy Future A
TVLCX12.67-0.01
-0.08%
Touchstone Value C
GRMIX31.32-0.18
-0.57%
Nationwide S&P 500 Index R6

TGMGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TGMGF and WPM have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TGMGF and WPM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TGMGF
1D Price
Change %
TGMGF100%
-32.56%
WPM - TGMGF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.06%
TGLDF - TGMGF
7%
Poorly correlated
-8.60%
UGDIF - TGMGF
6%
Poorly correlated
+12.01%
ARMN - TGMGF
1%
Poorly correlated
-5.71%
TSGZF - TGMGF
-5%
Poorly correlated
+0.50%
More

TSGZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TSGZF and LGCFF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TSGZF and LGCFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TSGZF
1D Price
Change %
TSGZF100%
+0.50%
LGCFF - TSGZF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.96%
ARMN - TSGZF
13%
Poorly correlated
-5.71%
UGDIF - TSGZF
7%
Poorly correlated
+12.01%
TGLDF - TSGZF
6%
Poorly correlated
-8.60%
TORXF - TSGZF
-4%
Poorly correlated
-0.37%
More