Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
TFCGX vs WCMLX
TFCGX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts TFCGX vs WCMLX
Taylor Frigon Core Growth
Price$19.97
Change-$0.51 (-2.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets30.66M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$14.46
Change-$0.18 (-1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.36M
TFCGX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
TFCGX vs. WCMLX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TFCGX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WCMLX has more cash in the bank: 47.4M vs. TFCGX (30.7M). TFCGX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . TFCGX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: TFCGX (9 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than TFCGX (1.45). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. TFCGX (30.28). TFCGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: TFCGX (5000) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.93 vs. TFCGX (-3.25). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -7.90 vs. TFCGX (-36.88).
| TFCGX | WCMLX | TFCGX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 0.99 | 146% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 1.79 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.972 | 5.087 | -157% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 100000 | 5% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 30.7M | 47.4M | 65% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.25 | 5.93 | -55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.07 | 18.04 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | -36.88 | -7.90 | 467% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement