TFC
Price
$51.42
Change
+$0.10 (+0.19%)
Updated
Jan 30 closing price
Capitalization
64.92B
75 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WBS
Price
$65.77
Change
+$0.15 (+0.23%)
Updated
Jan 30 closing price
Capitalization
10.6B
81 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

TFC vs WBS

Header iconTFC vs WBS Comparison
Open Charts TFC vs WBSBanner chart's image
Truist Financial
Price$51.42
Change+$0.10 (+0.19%)
Volume$12.03M
Capitalization64.92B
Webster Financial
Price$65.77
Change+$0.15 (+0.23%)
Volume$1.49M
Capitalization10.6B
TFC vs WBS Comparison Chart in %
TFC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WBS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
TFC vs. WBS commentary
Feb 01, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TFC is a Buy and WBS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 01, 2026
Stock price -- (TFC: $51.42 vs. WBS: $65.77)
Brand notoriety: TFC and WBS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: TFC: 140% vs. WBS: 106%
Market capitalization -- TFC: $64.92B vs. WBS: $10.6B
TFC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $64.92B. WBS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $10.6B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $155.8B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $9.15B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

TFC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWBS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • TFC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WBS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both TFC and WBS are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

TFC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WBS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • TFC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WBS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TFC is a better buy in the short-term than WBS.

Price Growth

TFC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +3.73% price change this week, while WBS (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.62% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.26%.

Reported Earning Dates

TFC is expected to report earnings on Apr 17, 2026.

WBS is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.22% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TFC($64.9B) has a higher market cap than WBS($10.6B). TFC has higher P/E ratio than WBS: TFC (13.46) vs WBS (11.15). WBS (4.496) and TFC (4.491) have similar YTD gains . TFC has more cash in the bank: 5.16B vs. WBS (425M). WBS has less debt than TFC: WBS (3.81B) vs TFC (71.1B). TFC has higher revenues than WBS: TFC (20.1B) vs WBS (2.81B).
TFCWBSTFC / WBS
Capitalization64.9B10.6B612%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD4.4914.496100%
P/E Ratio13.4611.15121%
Revenue20.1B2.81B715%
Total Cash5.16B425M1,213%
Total Debt71.1B3.81B1,866%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TFC vs WBS: Fundamental Ratings
TFC
WBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1830
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
65
Fair valued
51
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7244
SMR RATING
1..100
49
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
2447
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3772
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8565

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WBS's Valuation (51) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as TFC (65) in the null industry. This means that WBS’s stock grew similarly to TFC’s over the last 12 months.

WBS's Profit vs Risk Rating (44) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as TFC (72) in the null industry. This means that WBS’s stock grew similarly to TFC’s over the last 12 months.

TFC's SMR Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as WBS (9) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that TFC’s stock grew similarly to WBS’s over the last 12 months.

TFC's Price Growth Rating (24) in the null industry is in the same range as WBS (47) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that TFC’s stock grew similarly to WBS’s over the last 12 months.

TFC's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WBS (72) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that TFC’s stock grew somewhat faster than WBS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
TFCWBS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
TFC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WBS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GENT10.360.02
+0.19%
Genter Capital Taxable Qual Interm ETF
HYGV41.00N/A
N/A
FlexShares HY Val-Scrd Bd
FIDI27.15-0.22
-0.80%
Fidelity International High Div ETF
ASIA36.54-0.76
-2.04%
Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF
ROBN40.76-1.63
-3.85%
T-Rex 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF

TFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TFC has been closely correlated with CFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TFC jumps, then CFG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TFC
1D Price
Change %
TFC100%
+0.19%
CFG - TFC
93%
Closely correlated
-0.80%
KEY - TFC
92%
Closely correlated
-0.51%
FNB - TFC
91%
Closely correlated
-0.28%
MTB - TFC
90%
Closely correlated
+0.06%
WBS - TFC
90%
Closely correlated
+0.23%
More

WBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WBS has been closely correlated with FNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WBS jumps, then FNB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WBS
1D Price
Change %
WBS100%
+0.23%
FNB - WBS
93%
Closely correlated
-0.28%
WTFC - WBS
92%
Closely correlated
-0.28%
CFG - WBS
92%
Closely correlated
-0.80%
ONB - WBS
91%
Closely correlated
+0.12%
KEY - WBS
91%
Closely correlated
-0.51%
More