Advertisement
TEAM vs ZDGGF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TEAM is a Hold and ZDGGF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
TEAM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileZDGGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- TEAM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- ZDGGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
TEAM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZDGGF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- TEAM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- ZDGGF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
TEAM (@Packaged Software) experienced а -3.01% price change this week, while ZDGGF (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.00%.
Reported Earning Dates
TEAM is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-1.74% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| TEAM | ZDGGF | TEAM / ZDGGF | |
| Capitalization | 45.2B | 16.8M | 269,048% |
| EBITDA | 24M | -4.75M | -505% |
| Gain YTD | -29.152 | -68.687 | 42% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 5.22B | 46.8M | 11,143% |
| Total Cash | 2.94B | 4.34M | 67,673% |
| Total Debt | 1.24B | 5.63M | 22,011% |
TEAM | ZDGGF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 57 | 94 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 97 Overvalued | 48 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 98 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 96 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | 65 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 16 | 96 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ZDGGF's Valuation (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TEAM (97) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that ZDGGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TEAM’s over the last 12 months.
TEAM's Profit vs Risk Rating (98) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as ZDGGF (100) in the null industry. This means that TEAM’s stock grew similarly to ZDGGF’s over the last 12 months.
TEAM's SMR Rating (96) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as ZDGGF (97) in the null industry. This means that TEAM’s stock grew similarly to ZDGGF’s over the last 12 months.
TEAM's Price Growth Rating (65) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as ZDGGF (65) in the null industry. This means that TEAM’s stock grew similarly to ZDGGF’s over the last 12 months.
TEAM's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Information Technology Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for ZDGGF (96) in the null industry. This means that TEAM’s stock grew significantly faster than ZDGGF’s over the last 12 months.
| TEAM | ZDGGF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 25% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 37% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 47% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 18% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 52% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 78% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | N/A |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GTEK | 37.06 | 0.76 | +2.09% |
| Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Eq ETF | |||
| SMHB | 4.86 | 0.08 | +1.68% |
| ETRACS 2xMnthly Py Lvrgd US SmCpHiDivETN | |||
| EMXC | 64.40 | 0.56 | +0.88% |
| iShares MSCI Emerging Mkts ex China ETF | |||
| PFN | 7.64 | 0.04 | +0.53% |
| PIMCO Income Strategy Fund II | |||
| SDTY | 44.73 | -0.24 | -0.54% |
| YieldMax S&P 500 0DTE Cov Cll Stgy ETF | |||
TEAM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TEAM has been closely correlated with HUBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TEAM jumps, then HUBS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TEAM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TEAM | 100% | +2.59% | ||
| HUBS - TEAM | 72% Closely correlated | +5.00% | ||
| NOW - TEAM | 67% Closely correlated | +1.70% | ||
| CRM - TEAM | 64% Loosely correlated | +2.77% | ||
| DT - TEAM | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.46% | ||
| GTLB - TEAM | 60% Loosely correlated | +5.22% | ||
More | ||||
ZDGGF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ZDGGF and WIGBY have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ZDGGF and WIGBY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ZDGGF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZDGGF | 100% | N/A | ||
| WIGBY - ZDGGF | 30% Poorly correlated | -21.08% | ||
| PSFE - ZDGGF | 29% Poorly correlated | +9.14% | ||
| TEAM - ZDGGF | 23% Poorly correlated | +2.59% | ||
| ADYEY - ZDGGF | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.50% | ||
| ADYYF - ZDGGF | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.69% | ||
More | ||||