Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
TCMHX vs TRQZX
TCMHX vs TRQZX Comparison
Open Charts TCMHX vs TRQZX
Nuveen Quant Mid Cap Growth I
Price$20.82
Change+$0.16 (+0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets730.56M
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Z
Price$102.22
Change+$0.33 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.1B
TCMHX vs TRQZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
TCMHX vs. TRQZX commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TCMHX is a Hold and TRQZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRQZX has more cash in the bank: 25.1B vs. TCMHX (731M). TRQZX pays higher dividends than TCMHX: TRQZX (0.74) vs TCMHX (0.00). TCMHX was incepted earlier than TRQZX: TCMHX (10 years) vs TRQZX (6 years). TRQZX (0.61) and TCMHX (0.60) have similar cost to investors . TCMHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. TRQZX (22.60). TRQZX has a lower initial minimum investment than TCMHX: TRQZX (0) vs TCMHX (100000). TRQZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.85 vs. TCMHX (-5.15). TRQZX return over 5 years is better than : -9.61 vs. TCMHX (-25.54).
| TCMHX | TRQZX | TCMHX / TRQZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.61 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.223 | 3.967 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 731M | 25.1B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.74 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.15 | 0.85 | -609% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.89 | 10.89 | 192% |
| Returns for 5 years | -25.54 | -9.61 | 266% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.36 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers