Advertisement
TCLHF vs XIACY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TCLHF is a Hold and XIACY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
TCLHF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileXIACY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- TCLHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- XIACY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
TCLHF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while XIACY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- TCLHF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
- XIACY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
TCLHF (@Computer Peripherals) experienced а +0.79% price change this week, while XIACY (@Computer Peripherals) price change was -0.38% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Peripherals industry was +2.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +56.69%.
Reported Earning Dates
XIACY is expected to report earnings on Nov 24, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Peripherals (+2.11% weekly)Computer peripherals connect to a computer system to add functionality or to get information from or put information into computers. Think hard disk drive, data storage systems, cloud storage devices, printer and scanner, or mouse, keyboard etc. Some of the major companies operating in the computer peripherals industry include Western Digital Corporation, Seagate Technology PLC, NetApp, Inc., Zebra Technologies Corporation, and Xerox Holdings Corp.
| TCLHF | XIACY | TCLHF / XIACY | |
| Capitalization | 3.4B | 199B | 2% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 58.750 | 66.560 | 88% |
| P/E Ratio | 11.42 | 37.52 | 30% |
| Revenue | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | N/A | - |
TCLHF | XIACY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 32 | 75 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 6 Undervalued | 71 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 57 | 32 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 89 | 85 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 19 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TCLHF's Valuation (6) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for XIACY (71). This means that TCLHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than XIACY’s over the last 12 months.
XIACY's Profit vs Risk Rating (32) in the null industry is in the same range as TCLHF (57). This means that XIACY’s stock grew similarly to TCLHF’s over the last 12 months.
XIACY's SMR Rating (85) in the null industry is in the same range as TCLHF (89). This means that XIACY’s stock grew similarly to TCLHF’s over the last 12 months.
XIACY's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as TCLHF (45). This means that XIACY’s stock grew similarly to TCLHF’s over the last 12 months.
XIACY's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the null industry is in the same range as TCLHF (51). This means that XIACY’s stock grew similarly to TCLHF’s over the last 12 months.
| TCLHF | XIACY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 65% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 28 days ago 69% | 17 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 23 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 77% |
Advertisement
TCLHF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that TCLHF and RIME have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TCLHF and RIME's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TCLHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TCLHF | 100% | N/A | ||
| RIME - TCLHF | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SHCAF - TCLHF | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| XIACY - TCLHF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SNCPF - TCLHF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| XIACF - TCLHF | -1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
XIACY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XIACY has been closely correlated with XIACF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XIACY jumps, then XIACF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XIACY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XIACY | 100% | N/A | ||
| XIACF - XIACY | 86% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| SONY - XIACY | 27% Poorly correlated | +1.74% | ||
| SWDHF - XIACY | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SNEJF - XIACY | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| RIME - XIACY | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||