TCLAF
Price
$14.26
Change
-$0.09 (-0.63%)
Updated
Sep 22 closing price
Capitalization
1.17B
VKSC
Price
$1.50
Change
+$0.05 (+3.45%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
165.5M
Interact to see
Advertisement

TCLAF vs VKSC

Header iconTCLAF vs VKSC Comparison
Open Charts TCLAF vs VKSCBanner chart's image
Transcontinental
Price$14.26
Change-$0.09 (-0.63%)
Volume$2.61K
Capitalization1.17B
Viskase Companies
Price$1.50
Change+$0.05 (+3.45%)
Volume$13.1K
Capitalization165.5M
TCLAF vs VKSC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
TCLAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VKSC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
TCLAF vs. VKSC commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TCLAF is a Hold and VKSC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (TCLAF: $14.26 vs. VKSC: $1.50)
Brand notoriety: TCLAF and VKSC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Containers/Packaging industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: TCLAF: 38% vs. VKSC: 483%
Market capitalization -- TCLAF: $1.17B vs. VKSC: $165.5M
TCLAF [@Containers/Packaging] is valued at $1.17B. VKSC’s [@Containers/Packaging] market capitalization is $165.5M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Containers/Packaging] industry ranges from $66.8B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Containers/Packaging] industry is $4.89B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

TCLAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileVKSC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • TCLAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • VKSC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, VKSC is a better buy in the long-term than TCLAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

TCLAF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VKSC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • TCLAF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • VKSC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, VKSC is a better buy in the short-term than TCLAF.

Price Growth

TCLAF (@Containers/Packaging) experienced а -0.63% price change this week, while VKSC (@Containers/Packaging) price change was +3.45% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Containers/Packaging industry was -1.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.04%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Containers/Packaging (-1.40% weekly)

The containers/packing sector includes companies that manufacture containers (like plastic and aluminum food containers, glass bottles, metal cans, cardboard, storage and waste bags, giftwraps etc.) and provide packing services. Food-and-beverage and household products are major markets for this business. Several companies in this industry cater to international markets in addition to serving domestic customers. Consumer spending habits could potentially affect this industry’s performance. Some products, that use oil-based materials as inputs, are likely to see their costs of production get impacted (to some extent) by energy price movements. The ever-expanding e-commerce market has only supercharged the amount/frequency of goods shipped domestically and across borders, thereby creating ample potential opportunities for containers and packaging businesses. Ball Corporation, International Paper Company, Amcor Plc and Packaging Corporation of America are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TCLAF($1.17B) has a higher market cap than VKSC($166M). TCLAF YTD gains are higher at: 21.833 vs. VKSC (-6.250).
TCLAFVKSCTCLAF / VKSC
Capitalization1.17B166M705%
EBITDA498MN/A-
Gain YTD21.833-6.250-349%
P/E Ratio9.44N/A-
Revenue2.78BN/A-
Total Cash43.2MN/A-
Total Debt843MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TCLAF vs VKSC: Fundamental Ratings
TCLAF
VKSC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8847
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
66
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7982
SMR RATING
1..100
726
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5243
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7888
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TCLAF's Valuation (21) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for VKSC (66). This means that TCLAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than VKSC’s over the last 12 months.

TCLAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as VKSC (82). This means that TCLAF’s stock grew similarly to VKSC’s over the last 12 months.

VKSC's SMR Rating (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TCLAF (72). This means that VKSC’s stock grew significantly faster than TCLAF’s over the last 12 months.

VKSC's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as TCLAF (52). This means that VKSC’s stock grew similarly to TCLAF’s over the last 12 months.

TCLAF's P/E Growth Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as VKSC (88). This means that TCLAF’s stock grew similarly to VKSC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
TCLAFVKSC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
TCLAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VKSC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PMGJX5.36N/A
N/A
Principal MidCap Growth J
RYFAX91.82-0.43
-0.47%
Rydex Financial Services H
WMLIX35.71-0.19
-0.53%
Wilmington Large-Cap Strategy Instl
DCCIX30.93-0.28
-0.90%
Macquarie Small Cap Core I
BRXRX16.11-0.16
-0.98%
MFS Blended Research Intl Eq R1

TCLAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TCLAF and CCDBF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TCLAF and CCDBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TCLAF
1D Price
Change %
TCLAF100%
N/A
CCDBF - TCLAF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.94%
SUMXF - TCLAF
19%
Poorly correlated
+2.19%
RPKIF - TCLAF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VKSC - TCLAF
4%
Poorly correlated
+3.45%
SW - TCLAF
1%
Poorly correlated
-2.24%
More

VKSC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that VKSC and TCLAF have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VKSC and TCLAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VKSC
1D Price
Change %
VKSC100%
+3.45%
TCLAF - VKSC
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SW - VKSC
2%
Poorly correlated
-2.24%
SUMXF - VKSC
1%
Poorly correlated
+2.19%
MNHFF - VKSC
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SNGSF - VKSC
-3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More