TBLMF
Price
$18.00
Change
+$3.02 (+20.16%)
Updated
Jun 4 closing price
Capitalization
2.66B
UMEWF
Price
$0.40
Change
+$0.01 (+2.56%)
Updated
Aug 26 closing price
Capitalization
44.71M
Interact to see
Advertisement

TBLMF vs UMEWF

Header iconTBLMF vs UMEWF Comparison
Open Charts TBLMF vs UMEWFBanner chart's image
Tiger Brands
Price$18.00
Change+$3.02 (+20.16%)
Volume$100
Capitalization2.66B
UMeWorld
Price$0.40
Change+$0.01 (+2.56%)
Volume$3.1K
Capitalization44.71M
TBLMF vs UMEWF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
UMEWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
TBLMF vs. UMEWF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TBLMF is a Buy and UMEWF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (TBLMF: $18.00 vs. UMEWF: $0.40)
Brand notoriety: TBLMF and UMEWF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: TBLMF: 100% vs. UMEWF: 55%
Market capitalization -- TBLMF: $2.66B vs. UMEWF: $44.71M
TBLMF [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $2.66B. UMEWF’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $44.71M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $241.32B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $7.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

TBLMF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUMEWF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • TBLMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UMEWF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, TBLMF is a better buy in the long-term than UMEWF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

UMEWF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • UMEWF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

TBLMF (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while UMEWF (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -0.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +821.65%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (-0.61% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TBLMF($2.67B) has a higher market cap than UMEWF($44.7M). TBLMF YTD gains are higher at: 13.493 vs. UMEWF (0.000). TBLMF has more cash in the bank: 6.46B vs. UMEWF (8.47K). UMEWF has less debt than TBLMF: UMEWF (2.36M) vs TBLMF (828M).
TBLMFUMEWFTBLMF / UMEWF
Capitalization2.67B44.7M5,962%
EBITDA5.91BN/A-
Gain YTD13.4930.000-
P/E Ratio12.73N/A-
Revenue38BN/A-
Total Cash6.46B8.47K76,281,597%
Total Debt828M2.36M35,129%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TBLMF vs UMEWF: Fundamental Ratings
TBLMF
UMEWF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4498
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
23
Undervalued
98
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4978
SMR RATING
1..100
8997
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4837
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
44100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7565

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TBLMF's Valuation (23) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for UMEWF (98). This means that TBLMF’s stock grew significantly faster than UMEWF’s over the last 12 months.

TBLMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as UMEWF (78). This means that TBLMF’s stock grew similarly to UMEWF’s over the last 12 months.

TBLMF's SMR Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as UMEWF (97). This means that TBLMF’s stock grew similarly to UMEWF’s over the last 12 months.

UMEWF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as TBLMF (48). This means that UMEWF’s stock grew similarly to TBLMF’s over the last 12 months.

TBLMF's P/E Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UMEWF (100). This means that TBLMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than UMEWF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
TBLMFUMEWF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
UMEWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DSCSY25.920.43
+1.69%
Disco Corp.
MITUY12.55N/A
N/A
Mitsui Chemicals Inc.
LMEFF0.24N/A
N/A
Laurion Mineral Exploration Inc.
RBRI0.01N/A
N/A
RBR Global Inc.
KRNGY2.28-0.02
-0.87%
KAROON ENERGY LTD.

TBLMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TBLMF has been loosely correlated with HNFSA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TBLMF jumps, then HNFSA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TBLMF
1D Price
Change %
TBLMF100%
N/A
HNFSA - TBLMF
39%
Loosely correlated
-13.46%
INGR - TBLMF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.08%
TSUKY - TBLMF
10%
Poorly correlated
+0.19%
UVRBF - TBLMF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UELKY - TBLMF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

UMEWF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that UMEWF and VTSYF have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UMEWF and VTSYF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UMEWF
1D Price
Change %
UMEWF100%
N/A
VTSYF - UMEWF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TATYY - UMEWF
8%
Poorly correlated
-1.25%
TBLMF - UMEWF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WHGRF - UMEWF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TSUKY - UMEWF
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.19%
More