TBLMF
Price
$16.10
Change
+$0.25 (+1.58%)
Updated
Dec 13 closing price
UELKY
Price
$28.75
Change
-$22.75 (-44.17%)
Updated
Nov 20 closing price
Ad is loading...

TBLMF vs UELKY

Header iconTBLMF vs UELKY Comparison
Open Charts TBLMF vs UELKYBanner chart's image
Tiger Brands
Price$16.10
Change+$0.25 (+1.58%)
Volume$241
CapitalizationN/A
Ulker Biskuvi Sanayi AS
Price$28.75
Change-$22.75 (-44.17%)
Volume$500
CapitalizationN/A
TBLMF vs UELKY Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
TBLMF vs. UELKY commentary
Dec 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TBLMF is a Hold and UELKY is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 18, 2024
Stock price -- (TBLMF: $16.10 vs. UELKY: $28.75)
Brand notoriety: TBLMF and UELKY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: TBLMF: 4% vs. UELKY: 154%
Market capitalization -- TBLMF: $1.53B vs. UELKY: $495.92M
TBLMF [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $1.53B. UELKY’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $495.92M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

TBLMF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileUELKY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • TBLMF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • UELKY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TBLMF is a better buy in the long-term than UELKY.

Price Growth

TBLMF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а +7.26% price change this week, while UELKY (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.82%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.52%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-0.82% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TBLMF($1.53B) has a higher market cap than UELKY($496M). UELKY has higher P/E ratio than TBLMF: UELKY (13.26) vs TBLMF (9.29). TBLMF YTD gains are higher at: 45.966 vs. UELKY (-9.449). UELKY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.61B vs. TBLMF (3.93B). UELKY has more cash in the bank: 9.87B vs. TBLMF (658M). TBLMF has less debt than UELKY: TBLMF (2.79B) vs UELKY (25.2B). TBLMF has higher revenues than UELKY: TBLMF (36.7B) vs UELKY (32.4B).
TBLMFUELKYTBLMF / UELKY
Capitalization1.53B496M309%
EBITDA3.93B4.61B85%
Gain YTD45.966-9.449-486%
P/E Ratio9.2913.2670%
Revenue36.7B32.4B113%
Total Cash658M9.87B7%
Total Debt2.79B25.2B11%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TBLMF: Fundamental Ratings
TBLMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
23
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
97
SMR RATING
1..100
93
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
38
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
27
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME31.261.82
+6.18%
GameStop Corp
TSLA479.8616.84
+3.64%
Tesla
AAPL253.482.44
+0.97%
Apple
BTC.X106140.600000110.890625
+0.10%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY604.29-2.50
-0.41%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust

TBLMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TBLMF has been loosely correlated with HNFSA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TBLMF jumps, then HNFSA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TBLMF
1D Price
Change %
TBLMF100%
N/A
HNFSA - TBLMF
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
INGR - TBLMF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.57%
TSUKY - TBLMF
10%
Poorly correlated
-0.29%
UVRBF - TBLMF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UELKY - TBLMF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

UELKY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that UELKY and USNA have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UELKY and USNA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UELKY
1D Price
Change %
UELKY100%
N/A
USNA - UELKY
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.14%
TOFB - UELKY
11%
Poorly correlated
-9.69%
TATYY - UELKY
6%
Poorly correlated
-1.26%
TBLMF - UELKY
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UMEWF - UELKY
-1%
Poorly correlated
-10.00%
More