TATYY
Price
$29.37
Change
+$0.17 (+0.58%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
3.82B
67 days until earnings call
UMEWF
Price
$0.25
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 11 closing price
Capitalization
47.1M
Interact to see
Advertisement

TATYY vs UMEWF

Header iconTATYY vs UMEWF Comparison
Open Charts TATYY vs UMEWFBanner chart's image
Tate & Lyle
Price$29.37
Change+$0.17 (+0.58%)
Volume$106
Capitalization3.82B
UMeWorld
Price$0.25
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.1K
Capitalization47.1M
TATYY vs UMEWF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
TATYY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UMEWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
TATYY vs. UMEWF commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TATYY is a Hold and UMEWF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (TATYY: $29.37 vs. UMEWF: $0.25)
Brand notoriety: TATYY and UMEWF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: TATYY: 3% vs. UMEWF: 159%
Market capitalization -- TATYY: $3.82B vs. UMEWF: $47.1M
TATYY [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $3.82B. UMEWF’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $47.1M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.42B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

TATYY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileUMEWF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • TATYY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • UMEWF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, TATYY is a better buy in the long-term than UMEWF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

TATYY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UMEWF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • TATYY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • UMEWF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, UMEWF is a better buy in the short-term than TATYY.

Price Growth

TATYY (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а +0.75% price change this week, while UMEWF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.17%.

Reported Earning Dates

TATYY is expected to report earnings on Sep 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-0.38% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TATYY($3.82B) has a higher market cap than UMEWF($47.1M). TATYY YTD gains are higher at: -7.627 vs. UMEWF (-37.500). TATYY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 489M vs. UMEWF (-148.96K). TATYY has more cash in the bank: 403M vs. UMEWF (8.47K). UMEWF has less debt than TATYY: UMEWF (2.36M) vs TATYY (786M). TATYY has higher revenues than UMEWF: TATYY (2.81B) vs UMEWF (4).
TATYYUMEWFTATYY / UMEWF
Capitalization3.82B47.1M8,100%
EBITDA489M-148.96K-328,267%
Gain YTD-7.627-37.50020%
P/E Ratio16.47N/A-
Revenue2.81B470,175,000,000%
Total Cash403M8.47K4,760,217%
Total Debt786M2.36M33,347%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TATYY vs UMEWF: Fundamental Ratings
TATYY
UMEWF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6736
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
98
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9085
SMR RATING
1..100
8097
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5891
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TATYY's Valuation (27) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for UMEWF (98). This means that TATYY’s stock grew significantly faster than UMEWF’s over the last 12 months.

UMEWF's Profit vs Risk Rating (85) in the null industry is in the same range as TATYY (90). This means that UMEWF’s stock grew similarly to TATYY’s over the last 12 months.

TATYY's SMR Rating (80) in the null industry is in the same range as UMEWF (97). This means that TATYY’s stock grew similarly to UMEWF’s over the last 12 months.

TATYY's Price Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UMEWF (91). This means that TATYY’s stock grew somewhat faster than UMEWF’s over the last 12 months.

TATYY's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for UMEWF (100). This means that TATYY’s stock grew significantly faster than UMEWF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
TATYYUMEWF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
TATYY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UMEWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ILDR29.160.57
+1.98%
First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF
HOCT23.93N/A
N/A
Innovator Premium Income 9 Buf ETF - Oct
FLXR39.48-0.03
-0.08%
TCW Flexible Income ETF
SPLB22.36-0.07
-0.31%
SPDR® Portfolio Long Term Corp Bd ETF
AAPU21.10-0.13
-0.61%
Direxion Daily AAPL Bull 2X Shares

TATYY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TATYY and RSGUF have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TATYY and RSGUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TATYY
1D Price
Change %
TATYY100%
+0.58%
RSGUF - TATYY
11%
Poorly correlated
-2.55%
TATYF - TATYY
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UMEWF - TATYY
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PRRFY - TATYY
7%
Poorly correlated
+1.40%
VTSYF - TATYY
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

UMEWF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that UMEWF and VTSYF have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UMEWF and VTSYF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UMEWF
1D Price
Change %
UMEWF100%
N/A
VTSYF - UMEWF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TATYY - UMEWF
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.58%
TBLMF - UMEWF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WHGRF - UMEWF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TSUKY - UMEWF
1%
Poorly correlated
+4.28%
More