TAPM
Price
$0.39
Change
+$0.05 (+14.71%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Capitalization
2.05M
TCYSF
Price
$27.02
Change
-$2.16 (-7.40%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
299.57M
Interact to see
Advertisement

TAPM vs TCYSF

Header iconTAPM vs TCYSF Comparison
Open Charts TAPM vs TCYSFBanner chart's image
Tapinator
Price$0.39
Change+$0.05 (+14.71%)
Volume$100
Capitalization2.05M
Tecsys
Price$27.02
Change-$2.16 (-7.40%)
Volume$205
Capitalization299.57M
TAPM vs TCYSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
TAPM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TCYSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
TAPM vs. TCYSF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TAPM is a Buy and TCYSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (TAPM: $0.39 vs. TCYSF: $27.02)
Brand notoriety: TAPM and TCYSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: TAPM: 3% vs. TCYSF: 15%
Market capitalization -- TAPM: $2.05M vs. TCYSF: $299.57M
TAPM [@Packaged Software] is valued at $2.05M. TCYSF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $299.57M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

TAPM’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTCYSF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • TAPM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TCYSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TAPM is a better buy in the long-term than TCYSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

TAPM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TCYSF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • TAPM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • TCYSF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TAPM is a better buy in the short-term than TCYSF.

Price Growth

TAPM (@Packaged Software) experienced а +0.52% price change this week, while TCYSF (@Packaged Software) price change was -7.40% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +3.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.84%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+3.15% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TCYSF($300M) has a higher market cap than TAPM($2.05M). TCYSF YTD gains are higher at: -18.810 vs. TAPM (-26.415). TCYSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.99M vs. TAPM (-1.74M). TCYSF has more cash in the bank: 37.1M vs. TAPM (260K). TAPM has less debt than TCYSF: TAPM (129K) vs TCYSF (2.91M). TCYSF has higher revenues than TAPM: TCYSF (152M) vs TAPM (3.55M).
TAPMTCYSFTAPM / TCYSF
Capitalization2.05M300M1%
EBITDA-1.74M7.99M-22%
Gain YTD-26.415-18.810140%
P/E RatioN/A208.33-
Revenue3.55M152M2%
Total Cash260K37.1M1%
Total Debt129K2.91M4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TAPM vs TCYSF: Fundamental Ratings
TAPM
TCYSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
20
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10068
SMR RATING
1..100
484
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5963
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
594
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TCYSF's Valuation (20) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TAPM (86). This means that TCYSF’s stock grew significantly faster than TAPM’s over the last 12 months.

TCYSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (68) in the null industry is in the same range as TAPM (100). This means that TCYSF’s stock grew similarly to TAPM’s over the last 12 months.

TAPM's SMR Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TCYSF (84). This means that TAPM’s stock grew significantly faster than TCYSF’s over the last 12 months.

TAPM's Price Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is in the same range as TCYSF (63). This means that TAPM’s stock grew similarly to TCYSF’s over the last 12 months.

TAPM's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TCYSF (94). This means that TAPM’s stock grew significantly faster than TCYSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
TAPMTCYSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
TAPM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TCYSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VITL38.831.47
+3.93%
Vital Farms
HTCO0.20N/A
+1.50%
High-Trend International Group
KRC34.790.19
+0.55%
Kilroy Realty Corp
JD33.07-0.19
-0.57%
JD.com
TRVG3.61-0.08
-2.17%
trivago NV

TAPM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TAPM and LOQPF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TAPM and LOQPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TAPM
1D Price
Change %
TAPM100%
N/A
LOQPF - TAPM
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CXM - TAPM
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.26%
DOCN - TAPM
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.55%
GDDY - TAPM
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WK - TAPM
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.03%
More

TCYSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TCYSF and HKIT have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TCYSF and HKIT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TCYSF
1D Price
Change %
TCYSF100%
-7.40%
HKIT - TCYSF
33%
Poorly correlated
+2.24%
STRM - TCYSF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.19%
TMICY - TCYSF
7%
Poorly correlated
-2.60%
UBSFF - TCYSF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TAPM - TCYSF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More