Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
TAN vs TOKE
TAN vs TOKE Comparison
Open Charts TAN vs TOKE
Invesco Solar ETF
Price$38.73
Change+$1.69 (+4.56%)
Volume$1.96M
Net Assets680.62M
Cambria Cannabis ETF
Price$4.58
Change-$0.02 (-0.43%)
Volume$1.53K
Net Assets11.92M
TAN vs TOKE Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
TAN vs. TOKE commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TAN is a Buy and TOKE is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TAN has more net assets: 681M vs. TOKE (11.9M). TAN has a higher annual dividend yield than TOKE: TAN (16.938) vs TOKE (-10.564). TAN was incepted earlier than TOKE: TAN (17 years) vs TOKE (6 years). TOKE (0.43) has a lower expense ratio than TAN (0.71). TAN has a higher turnover TOKE (13.00) vs TOKE (13.00).
| TAN | TOKE | TAN / TOKE | |
| Gain YTD | 16.938 | -10.564 | -160% |
| Net Assets | 681M | 11.9M | 5,723% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.43 | 165% |
| Turnover | 43.00 | 13.00 | 331% |
| Yield | 0.48 | 5.17 | 9% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| TAN | TOKE | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 5 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 17 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
TAN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TAN has been closely correlated with CSIQ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TAN jumps, then CSIQ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TAN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TAN | 100% | +4.56% | ||
| CSIQ - TAN | 78% Closely correlated | +0.56% | ||
| FSLR - TAN | 77% Closely correlated | +8.51% | ||
| SEDG - TAN | 75% Closely correlated | +16.69% | ||
| RUN - TAN | 73% Closely correlated | +16.80% | ||
| ENPH - TAN | 70% Closely correlated | +3.91% | ||
More | ||||
TOKE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TOKE has been loosely correlated with HITI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TOKE jumps, then HITI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TOKE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOKE | 100% | -0.47% | ||
| HITI - TOKE | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.85% | ||
| CRON - TOKE | 32% Poorly correlated | +2.00% | ||
| SNDL - TOKE | 31% Poorly correlated | +1.60% | ||
| TLRY - TOKE | 31% Poorly correlated | +11.03% | ||
| UVV - TOKE | 28% Poorly correlated | +1.01% | ||
More | ||||