Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
TAN vs TOKE
TAN vs TOKE Comparison
Open Charts TAN vs TOKE
Invesco Solar ETF
Price$39.11
Change-$0.02 (-0.05%)
Volume$187.77K
Net Assets681.8M
Cambria Cannabis ETF
Price$4.92
Change+$0.06 (+1.23%)
Volume$5.7K
Net Assets11.84M
TAN vs TOKE Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
TAN vs. TOKE commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TAN is a Hold and TOKE is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TAN has more net assets: 682M vs. TOKE (11.8M). TAN has a higher annual dividend yield than TOKE: TAN (18.086) vs TOKE (-3.949). TAN was incepted earlier than TOKE: TAN (17 years) vs TOKE (6 years). TOKE (0.43) has a lower expense ratio than TAN (0.71). TAN has a higher turnover TOKE (13.00) vs TOKE (13.00).
| TAN | TOKE | TAN / TOKE | |
| Gain YTD | 18.086 | -3.949 | -458% |
| Net Assets | 682M | 11.8M | 5,780% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.43 | 165% |
| Turnover | 43.00 | 13.00 | 331% |
| Yield | 0.48 | 5.17 | 9% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| TAN | TOKE | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 89% | 6 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
TAN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TAN has been closely correlated with CSIQ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TAN jumps, then CSIQ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TAN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TAN | 100% | -0.05% | ||
| CSIQ - TAN | 77% Closely correlated | -0.78% | ||
| FSLR - TAN | 75% Closely correlated | +2.55% | ||
| SEDG - TAN | 75% Closely correlated | -4.36% | ||
| RUN - TAN | 71% Closely correlated | +1.89% | ||
| ENPH - TAN | 69% Closely correlated | -0.30% | ||
More | ||||
TOKE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TOKE has been loosely correlated with HITI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TOKE jumps, then HITI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TOKE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOKE | 100% | +1.07% | ||
| HITI - TOKE | 41% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| CRON - TOKE | 32% Poorly correlated | -0.97% | ||
| SNDL - TOKE | 31% Poorly correlated | -1.62% | ||
| TLRY - TOKE | 31% Poorly correlated | -2.03% | ||
| SAM - TOKE | 29% Poorly correlated | +6.54% | ||
More | ||||