Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
TAN vs TOKE
TAN vs TOKE Comparison
Open Charts TAN vs TOKE
Invesco Solar ETF
Price$34.97
Change+$0.74 (+2.16%)
Volume$1.21M
Net Assets625.74M
Cambria Cannabis ETF
Price$4.41
Change-$0.10 (-2.22%)
Volume$84.25K
Net Assets11.38M
TAN vs TOKE Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
TAN vs. TOKE commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TAN is a Buy and TOKE is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TAN has more net assets: 626M vs. TOKE (11.4M). TAN has a higher annual dividend yield than TOKE: TAN (5.586) vs TOKE (-14.065). TAN was incepted earlier than TOKE: TAN (17 years) vs TOKE (6 years). TOKE (0.43) has a lower expense ratio than TAN (0.71). TAN has a higher turnover TOKE (13.00) vs TOKE (13.00).
| TAN | TOKE | TAN / TOKE | |
| Gain YTD | 5.586 | -14.065 | -40% |
| Net Assets | 626M | 11.4M | 5,491% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.43 | 165% |
| Turnover | 43.00 | 13.00 | 331% |
| Yield | 0.51 | 6.02 | 8% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| TAN | TOKE | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 89% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 26 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 5 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
TAN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TAN has been closely correlated with CSIQ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TAN jumps, then CSIQ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TAN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TAN | 100% | +2.16% | ||
| CSIQ - TAN | 78% Closely correlated | +1.38% | ||
| FSLR - TAN | 75% Closely correlated | +4.39% | ||
| SEDG - TAN | 71% Closely correlated | +10.85% | ||
| RUN - TAN | 71% Closely correlated | +18.06% | ||
| ARRY - TAN | 69% Closely correlated | +7.13% | ||
More | ||||
TOKE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TOKE has been loosely correlated with HITI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TOKE jumps, then HITI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TOKE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOKE | 100% | -2.22% | ||
| HITI - TOKE | 39% Loosely correlated | -2.15% | ||
| CRON - TOKE | 32% Poorly correlated | -3.02% | ||
| SNDL - TOKE | 31% Poorly correlated | -4.44% | ||
| TLRY - TOKE | 31% Poorly correlated | -2.95% | ||
| UVV - TOKE | 28% Poorly correlated | -1.16% | ||
More | ||||