Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
TAN vs TOKE
TAN vs TOKE Comparison
Open Charts TAN vs TOKE
Invesco Solar ETF
Price$39.84
Change+$3.22 (+8.79%)
Volume$2.18M
Net Assets688.63M
Cambria Cannabis ETF
Price$6.08
Change-$0.24 (-3.80%)
Volume$14.83K
Net Assets13.6M
TAN vs TOKE Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
TAN vs. TOKE commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TAN is a StrongBuy and TOKE is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TAN has more net assets: 689M vs. TOKE (13.6M). TAN has a higher annual dividend yield than TOKE: TAN (20.290) vs TOKE (18.715). TAN was incepted earlier than TOKE: TAN (17 years) vs TOKE (6 years). TOKE (0.43) has a lower expense ratio than TAN (0.71). TAN has a higher turnover TOKE (13.00) vs TOKE (13.00).
| TAN | TOKE | TAN / TOKE | |
| Gain YTD | 20.290 | 18.715 | 108% |
| Net Assets | 689M | 13.6M | 5,066% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.43 | 165% |
| Turnover | 43.00 | 13.00 | 331% |
| Yield | 0.45 | 4.88 | 9% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| TAN | TOKE | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 89% | 5 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
TAN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TAN has been closely correlated with CSIQ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TAN jumps, then CSIQ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TAN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TAN | 100% | +8.79% | ||
| CSIQ - TAN | 76% Closely correlated | +7.45% | ||
| FSLR - TAN | 75% Closely correlated | +11.05% | ||
| SEDG - TAN | 74% Closely correlated | +17.10% | ||
| RUN - TAN | 70% Closely correlated | +32.82% | ||
| ENPH - TAN | 69% Closely correlated | +8.13% | ||
More | ||||
TOKE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TOKE has been loosely correlated with CRON. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TOKE jumps, then CRON could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TOKE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOKE | 100% | -3.84% | ||
| CRON - TOKE | 62% Loosely correlated | -5.95% | ||
| SNDL - TOKE | 58% Loosely correlated | -4.27% | ||
| TLRY - TOKE | 56% Loosely correlated | -12.71% | ||
| VFF - TOKE | 52% Loosely correlated | -8.87% | ||
| ACB - TOKE | 52% Loosely correlated | -5.75% | ||
More | ||||