SZZLU
Price
Loading...
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Loading...
Capitalization
N/A
TBMC
Price
$11.65
Change
+$0.04 (+0.34%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
52.41M
Interact to see
Advertisement

SZZLU vs TBMC

Header iconSZZLU vs TBMC Comparison
Open Charts SZZLU vs TBMCBanner chart's image
Sizzle Acquisition Corp II
PriceLoading...
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Trailblazer Merger
Price$11.65
Change+$0.04 (+0.34%)
Volume$324
Capitalization52.41M
SZZLU vs TBMC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SZZLU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TBMC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SZZLU vs. TBMC commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SZZLU is a Hold and TBMC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (SZZLU: $10.21 vs. TBMC: $11.65)
Brand notoriety: SZZLU and TBMC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SZZLU: 8% vs. TBMC: 3%
Market capitalization -- SZZLU: $0 vs. TBMC: $52.41M
SZZLU [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $0. TBMC’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $52.41M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $171.68M.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SZZLU’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTBMC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SZZLU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TBMC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both SZZLU and TBMC are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SZZLU’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TBMC’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SZZLU’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TBMC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TBMC is a better buy in the short-term than SZZLU.

Price Growth

SZZLU (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TBMC (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +0.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.78%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-0.01% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SZZLU has less debt than TBMC: SZZLU (262K) vs TBMC (3.74M).
SZZLUTBMCSZZLU / TBMC
CapitalizationN/A52.4M-
EBITDAN/A-2.44M-
Gain YTDN/A4.672-
P/E RatioN/A293.75-
RevenueN/A0-
Total CashN/A99.4K-
Total Debt262K3.74M7%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SZZLUTBMC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
8%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
15%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
15%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
10%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
22%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
14%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
14%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
14%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
18%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
32%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SZZLU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TBMC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ATCMF0.110.01
+8.10%
Atico Mining Corp
EBCOY10.380.17
+1.67%
Ebara Corp.
CMGMF7.30N/A
N/A
Chemring Group Plc.
AFSIC15.95-0.05
-0.31%
AmTrust Financial Services, Inc.
SEUSF0.42-0.01
-2.55%
Sintana Energy, Inc.

SZZLU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SZZLU has been loosely correlated with AACIU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SZZLU jumps, then AACIU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SZZLU
1D Price
Change %
SZZLU100%
N/A
AACIU - SZZLU
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
AIMUF - SZZLU
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HCMAU - SZZLU
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.10%
SVIIU - SZZLU
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TBMC - SZZLU
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.50%
More