SWSDF
Price
$1087.00
Change
-$4.41 (-0.40%)
Updated
Aug 13 closing price
Capitalization
29.55B
SZLMY
Price
$52.18
Change
-$1.17 (-2.19%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
29.55B
Interact to see
Advertisement

SWSDF vs SZLMY

Header iconSWSDF vs SZLMY Comparison
Open Charts SWSDF vs SZLMYBanner chart's image
Swiss Life Holding
Price$1087.00
Change-$4.41 (-0.40%)
Volume$32
Capitalization29.55B
Swiss Life Holding
Price$52.18
Change-$1.17 (-2.19%)
Volume$9.85K
Capitalization29.55B
SWSDF vs SZLMY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SWSDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SZLMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SWSDF vs. SZLMY commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SWSDF is a Hold and SZLMY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (SWSDF: $1087.00 vs. SZLMY: $52.18)
Brand notoriety: SWSDF and SZLMY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Multi-Line Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SWSDF: 164% vs. SZLMY: 150%
Market capitalization -- SWSDF: $29.55B vs. SZLMY: $29.55B
SWSDF [@Multi-Line Insurance] is valued at $29.55B. SZLMY’s [@Multi-Line Insurance] market capitalization is $29.55B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry ranges from $634.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry is $31.77B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SWSDF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSZLMY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SWSDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SZLMY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SWSDF is a better buy in the long-term than SZLMY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SWSDF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SZLMY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SWSDF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • SZLMY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SWSDF is a better buy in the short-term than SZLMY.

Price Growth

SWSDF (@Multi-Line Insurance) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SZLMY (@Multi-Line Insurance) price change was -3.57% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Multi-Line Insurance industry was -1.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.81%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Multi-Line Insurance (-1.00% weekly)

A multi-line insurance contract bundles together exposures to risk and covers them under a single contract. For providers of such policies, the bundle is a potential risk diversification strategy since their exposure gets spread over several factors, which helps them mitigate a financial burden if a catastrophic event were to occur. Other potential benefits include getting more premiums from including more than one type of insurance in a bundle, and getting a competitive edge by procuring multiple insurance contracts with a customer. Examples of companies in this industry are Berkshire Hathaway (which owns several insurance companies), Chubb Limited, American International Group, Inc. and Sun Life Financial Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SWSDF($29.5B) and SZLMY($29.5B) have the same market capitalization . SWSDF (21.08) and SZLMY (20.24) have similar P/E ratio . SWSDF YTD gains are higher at: 47.895 vs. SZLMY (39.079).
SWSDFSZLMYSWSDF / SZLMY
Capitalization29.5B29.5B100%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD47.89539.079123%
P/E Ratio21.0820.24104%
Revenue14.4BN/A-
Total Cash59.5BN/A-
Total Debt9.41BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SWSDF vs SZLMY: Fundamental Ratings
SWSDF
SZLMY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
57
Fair valued
52
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
126
SMR RATING
1..100
9797
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4551
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3037
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7575

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SZLMY's Valuation (52) in the null industry is in the same range as SWSDF (57). This means that SZLMY’s stock grew similarly to SWSDF’s over the last 12 months.

SZLMY's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the null industry is in the same range as SWSDF (12). This means that SZLMY’s stock grew similarly to SWSDF’s over the last 12 months.

SZLMY's SMR Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as SWSDF (97). This means that SZLMY’s stock grew similarly to SWSDF’s over the last 12 months.

SWSDF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as SZLMY (51). This means that SWSDF’s stock grew similarly to SZLMY’s over the last 12 months.

SWSDF's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the null industry is in the same range as SZLMY (37). This means that SWSDF’s stock grew similarly to SZLMY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SWSDFSZLMY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
27%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
45%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SWSDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SZLMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SKYE4.000.25
+6.67%
Skye Bioscience
STLD134.633.77
+2.88%
Steel Dynamics
VINP10.150.11
+1.10%
Vinci Compass Investments Ltd
BKU38.98-0.44
-1.12%
Bankunited
BNZI2.46-0.35
-12.46%
Banzai International Inc

SWSDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SWSDF and SZLMY have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SWSDF and SZLMY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SWSDF
1D Price
Change %
SWSDF100%
N/A
SZLMY - SWSDF
10%
Poorly correlated
-2.20%
NDEV - SWSDF
5%
Poorly correlated
+4.29%
NNGPF - SWSDF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SAXPY - SWSDF
1%
Poorly correlated
+1.51%
NNGRY - SWSDF
0%
Poorly correlated
+0.49%
More

SZLMY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SZLMY and ARZGY have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SZLMY and ARZGY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SZLMY
1D Price
Change %
SZLMY100%
-2.20%
ARZGY - SZLMY
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.26%
ALIZY - SZLMY
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.12%
AGESY - SZLMY
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.57%
NNGPF - SZLMY
18%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NNGRY - SZLMY
14%
Poorly correlated
+0.49%
More