SWPFF
Price
$2.32
Change
+$0.07 (+3.11%)
Updated
Jun 16 closing price
Capitalization
14.63B
UOLGY
Price
$20.75
Change
-$0.22 (-1.05%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
4.47B
31 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

SWPFF vs UOLGY

Header iconSWPFF vs UOLGY Comparison
Open Charts SWPFF vs UOLGYBanner chart's image
Swire Properties
Price$2.32
Change+$0.07 (+3.11%)
Volume$1.67K
Capitalization14.63B
UOL Group
Price$20.75
Change-$0.22 (-1.05%)
Volume$2.87K
Capitalization4.47B
SWPFF vs UOLGY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SWPFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UOLGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SWPFF vs. UOLGY commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SWPFF is a Hold and UOLGY is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (SWPFF: $2.32 vs. UOLGY: $20.75)
Brand notoriety: SWPFF and UOLGY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SWPFF: 81% vs. UOLGY: 20%
Market capitalization -- SWPFF: $14.63B vs. UOLGY: $4.47B
SWPFF [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $14.63B. UOLGY’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $4.47B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SWPFF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUOLGY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SWPFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UOLGY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both SWPFF and UOLGY are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SWPFF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UOLGY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SWPFF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • UOLGY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, UOLGY is a better buy in the short-term than SWPFF.

Price Growth

SWPFF (@Real Estate Development) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while UOLGY (@Real Estate Development) price change was +5.44% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +31.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +35.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.95%.

Reported Earning Dates

UOLGY is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+31.43% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SWPFF($14.6B) has a higher market cap than UOLGY($4.47B). SWPFF has higher P/E ratio than UOLGY: SWPFF (14.12) vs UOLGY (12.42). UOLGY YTD gains are higher at: 33.660 vs. SWPFF (15.136). SWPFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 11.7B vs. UOLGY (1.15B). SWPFF has higher revenues than UOLGY: SWPFF (13.5B) vs UOLGY (3.2B).
SWPFFUOLGYSWPFF / UOLGY
Capitalization14.6B4.47B327%
EBITDA11.7B1.15B1,020%
Gain YTD15.13633.66045%
P/E Ratio14.1212.42114%
Revenue13.5B3.2B422%
Total Cash5.91BN/A-
Total Debt21.4BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SWPFF vs UOLGY: Fundamental Ratings
SWPFF
UOLGY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5041
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
39
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9775
SMR RATING
1..100
8695
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4842
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
427
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SWPFF's Valuation (15) in the null industry is in the same range as UOLGY (39). This means that SWPFF’s stock grew similarly to UOLGY’s over the last 12 months.

UOLGY's Profit vs Risk Rating (75) in the null industry is in the same range as SWPFF (97). This means that UOLGY’s stock grew similarly to SWPFF’s over the last 12 months.

SWPFF's SMR Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as UOLGY (95). This means that SWPFF’s stock grew similarly to UOLGY’s over the last 12 months.

UOLGY's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as SWPFF (48). This means that UOLGY’s stock grew similarly to SWPFF’s over the last 12 months.

UOLGY's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SWPFF (42). This means that UOLGY’s stock grew somewhat faster than SWPFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SWPFFUOLGY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
42%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
28%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
51%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
54%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
48%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SWPFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UOLGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BOUT36.920.60
+1.66%
Innovator IBD® Breakout Opps ETF
JPEF70.830.58
+0.83%
JPMorgan Equity Focus ETF
CPSL26.360.03
+0.13%
Calamos Laddered S&P 500 Str Alt Prt ETF
NBH9.910.01
+0.10%
Neuberger Berman Municipal Fund
KEAT27.230.02
+0.07%
Keating Active ETF

SWPFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SWPFF and CLILF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SWPFF and CLILF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SWPFF
1D Price
Change %
SWPFF100%
N/A
CLILF - SWPFF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HBUV - SWPFF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ACNDF - SWPFF
21%
Poorly correlated
+4.11%
GRGTF - SWPFF
20%
Poorly correlated
-3.43%
UOLGY - SWPFF
10%
Poorly correlated
-1.05%
More

UOLGY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that UOLGY and SUHJY have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UOLGY and SUHJY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UOLGY
1D Price
Change %
UOLGY100%
-1.05%
SUHJY - UOLGY
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.67%
VONOY - UOLGY
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.58%
DRUNF - UOLGY
25%
Poorly correlated
+5.13%
NDVLY - UOLGY
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SVAUF - UOLGY
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More