SWKH
Price
$17.39
Change
-$0.02 (-0.11%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
210.59M
81 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VRTS
Price
$169.79
Change
+$0.90 (+0.53%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
1.15B
15 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SWKH vs VRTS

Header iconSWKH vs VRTS Comparison
Open Charts SWKH vs VRTSBanner chart's image
SWK Holdings
Price$17.39
Change-$0.02 (-0.11%)
Volume$1.82K
Capitalization210.59M
Virtus Investment Partners
Price$169.79
Change+$0.90 (+0.53%)
Volume$88.56K
Capitalization1.15B
SWKH vs VRTS Comparison Chart in %
SWKH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VRTS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SWKH vs. VRTS commentary
Jan 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SWKH is a Hold and VRTS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2026
Stock price -- (SWKH: $17.39 vs. VRTS: $169.79)
Brand notoriety: SWKH and VRTS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SWKH: 18% vs. VRTS: 122%
Market capitalization -- SWKH: $210.59M vs. VRTS: $1.15B
SWKH [@Investment Managers] is valued at $210.59M. VRTS’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $1.15B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $169.4B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SWKH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileVRTS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SWKH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • VRTS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SWKH is a better buy in the long-term than VRTS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SWKH’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VRTS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SWKH’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • VRTS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, VRTS is a better buy in the short-term than SWKH.

Price Growth

SWKH (@Investment Managers) experienced а +0.64% price change this week, while VRTS (@Investment Managers) price change was +2.03% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +1.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.77%.

Reported Earning Dates

SWKH is expected to report earnings on Apr 06, 2026.

VRTS is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+1.24% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VRTS($1.15B) has a higher market cap than SWKH($211M). SWKH has higher P/E ratio than VRTS: SWKH (9.41) vs VRTS (8.72). VRTS YTD gains are higher at: 4.070 vs. SWKH (1.105). VRTS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 425M vs. SWKH (34.8M). VRTS has more cash in the bank: 461M vs. SWKH (10.2M). SWKH has less debt than VRTS: SWKH (31.9M) vs VRTS (2.52B). VRTS has higher revenues than SWKH: VRTS (874M) vs SWKH (45.1M).
SWKHVRTSSWKH / VRTS
Capitalization211M1.15B18%
EBITDA34.8M425M8%
Gain YTD1.1054.07027%
P/E Ratio9.418.72108%
Revenue45.1M874M5%
Total Cash10.2M461M2%
Total Debt31.9M2.52B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SWKH vs VRTS: Fundamental Ratings
SWKH
VRTS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
257
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
73
Overvalued
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
31100
SMR RATING
1..100
7654
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4876
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9585
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

VRTS's Valuation (12) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SWKH (73) in the null industry. This means that VRTS’s stock grew somewhat faster than SWKH’s over the last 12 months.

SWKH's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for VRTS (100) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that SWKH’s stock grew significantly faster than VRTS’s over the last 12 months.

VRTS's SMR Rating (54) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as SWKH (76) in the null industry. This means that VRTS’s stock grew similarly to SWKH’s over the last 12 months.

SWKH's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as VRTS (76) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that SWKH’s stock grew similarly to VRTS’s over the last 12 months.

VRTS's P/E Growth Rating (85) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as SWKH (95) in the null industry. This means that VRTS’s stock grew similarly to SWKH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SWKHVRTS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SWKH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VRTS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SVNDY14.110.26
+1.88%
Seven & I Holdings Co., Ltd.
FUJSF19.70N/A
N/A
Fuji Seal, Inc.
POROF0.34N/A
N/A
Panoro Minerals Ltd.
CCMCF0.39N/A
N/A
Core Critical Metals Corp.
SKLTY30.46-0.42
-1.34%
Seek Ltd

SWKH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SWKH and DHIL have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SWKH and DHIL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SWKH
1D Price
Change %
SWKH100%
-0.11%
DHIL - SWKH
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.40%
STT - SWKH
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.44%
APAM - SWKH
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.79%
VRTS - SWKH
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.53%
NTRS - SWKH
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.07%
More

VRTS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VRTS has been closely correlated with APAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VRTS jumps, then APAM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VRTS
1D Price
Change %
VRTS100%
+0.53%
APAM - VRTS
69%
Closely correlated
+0.79%
TROW - VRTS
68%
Closely correlated
+2.48%
JHG - VRTS
68%
Closely correlated
+0.52%
RJF - VRTS
67%
Closely correlated
+3.04%
BX - VRTS
66%
Loosely correlated
+2.23%
More