SWIN
Price
$3.84
Change
+$0.27 (+7.56%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
87.08M
ZBAI
Price
$0.34
Change
+$0.02 (+6.25%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
9.43M
Interact to see
Advertisement

SWIN vs ZBAI

Header iconSWIN vs ZBAI Comparison
Open Charts SWIN vs ZBAIBanner chart's image
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share
Price$3.84
Change+$0.27 (+7.56%)
Volume$232.49K
Capitalization87.08M
ATIF Holdings
Price$0.34
Change+$0.02 (+6.25%)
Volume$141.04K
Capitalization9.43M
SWIN vs ZBAI Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SWIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ZBAI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SWIN vs. ZBAI commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SWIN is a Hold and ZBAI is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (SWIN: $3.57 vs. ZBAI: $0.34)
Brand notoriety: SWIN and ZBAI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SWIN: 4% vs. ZBAI: 12%
Market capitalization -- SWIN: $87.08M vs. ZBAI: $9.43M
SWIN [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $87.08M. ZBAI’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $9.43M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SWIN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileZBAI’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • SWIN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ZBAI’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SWIN is a better buy in the long-term than ZBAI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SWIN’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZBAI’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SWIN’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • ZBAI’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SWIN is a better buy in the short-term than ZBAI.

Price Growth

SWIN (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +16.67% price change this week, while ZBAI (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +9.08% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +24.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +112.48%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+24.10% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SWIN($87.1M) has a higher market cap than ZBAI($9.44M). SWIN YTD gains are higher at: 116.364 vs. ZBAI (-68.276).
SWINZBAISWIN / ZBAI
Capitalization87.1M9.44M923%
EBITDAN/A-5.12M-
Gain YTD116.364-68.276-170%
P/E Ratio67.46N/A-
RevenueN/A400K-
Total CashN/A688K-
Total DebtN/A818K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ZBAI: Fundamental Ratings
ZBAI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
98
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
98
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SWINZBAI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SWIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ZBAI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CKHGY100.43N/A
N/A
Capitec Bank Holdings Ltd
LSANF4.35N/A
N/A
Los Andes Copper Ltd.
RUBSF31.25N/A
N/A
RUBIS
VLTAF7.07N/A
N/A
VOLTALIA SA
GGLDF0.16N/A
-1.44%
Getchell Gold Corporation

SWIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SWIN and TOP have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SWIN and TOP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SWIN
1D Price
Change %
SWIN100%
N/A
TOP - SWIN
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.79%
HIVE - SWIN
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DEFT - SWIN
20%
Poorly correlated
+5.72%
CIFR - SWIN
19%
Poorly correlated
+6.51%
CLSK - SWIN
18%
Poorly correlated
-1.84%
More

ZBAI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ZBAI and SKYC have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ZBAI and SKYC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ZBAI
1D Price
Change %
ZBAI100%
+4.55%
SKYC - ZBAI
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MEGL - ZBAI
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.86%
TW - ZBAI
13%
Poorly correlated
+0.27%
SWIN - ZBAI
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BTBT - ZBAI
7%
Poorly correlated
+11.79%
More