SW
Price
$43.43
Change
-$0.20 (-0.46%)
Updated
Aug 11, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
22.78B
79 days until earnings call
TCLAF
Price
$14.09
Change
+$0.14 (+1.00%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
1.19B
Interact to see
Advertisement

SW vs TCLAF

Header iconSW vs TCLAF Comparison
Open Charts SW vs TCLAFBanner chart's image
Smurfit WestRock
Price$43.43
Change-$0.20 (-0.46%)
Volume$20.24K
Capitalization22.78B
Transcontinental
Price$14.09
Change+$0.14 (+1.00%)
Volume$200
Capitalization1.19B
SW vs TCLAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TCLAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SW vs. TCLAF commentary
Aug 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SW is a Hold and TCLAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 12, 2025
Stock price -- (SW: $43.63 vs. TCLAF: $14.09)
Brand notoriety: SW and TCLAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Containers/Packaging industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SW: 76% vs. TCLAF: 1%
Market capitalization -- SW: $22.78B vs. TCLAF: $1.19B
SW [@Containers/Packaging] is valued at $22.78B. TCLAF’s [@Containers/Packaging] market capitalization is $1.19B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Containers/Packaging] industry ranges from $66.8B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Containers/Packaging] industry is $5.25B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SW’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTCLAF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TCLAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SW is a better buy in the long-term than TCLAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SW’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TCLAF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TCLAF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SW is a better buy in the short-term than TCLAF.

Price Growth

SW (@Containers/Packaging) experienced а -1.62% price change this week, while TCLAF (@Containers/Packaging) price change was +1.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Containers/Packaging industry was +1.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.40%.

Reported Earning Dates

SW is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Containers/Packaging (+1.73% weekly)

The containers/packing sector includes companies that manufacture containers (like plastic and aluminum food containers, glass bottles, metal cans, cardboard, storage and waste bags, giftwraps etc.) and provide packing services. Food-and-beverage and household products are major markets for this business. Several companies in this industry cater to international markets in addition to serving domestic customers. Consumer spending habits could potentially affect this industry’s performance. Some products, that use oil-based materials as inputs, are likely to see their costs of production get impacted (to some extent) by energy price movements. The ever-expanding e-commerce market has only supercharged the amount/frequency of goods shipped domestically and across borders, thereby creating ample potential opportunities for containers and packaging businesses. Ball Corporation, International Paper Company, Amcor Plc and Packaging Corporation of America are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SW($22.8B) has a higher market cap than TCLAF($1.19B). SW has higher P/E ratio than TCLAF: SW (167.81) vs TCLAF (9.05). TCLAF YTD gains are higher at: 20.380 vs. SW (-17.589). SW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.29B vs. TCLAF (498M). SW has more cash in the bank: 797M vs. TCLAF (43.2M). TCLAF has less debt than SW: TCLAF (843M) vs SW (14.2B). SW has higher revenues than TCLAF: SW (25.8B) vs TCLAF (2.78B).
SWTCLAFSW / TCLAF
Capitalization22.8B1.19B1,918%
EBITDA3.29B498M660%
Gain YTD-17.58920.380-86%
P/E Ratio167.819.051,855%
Revenue25.8B2.78B929%
Total Cash797M43.2M1,845%
Total Debt14.2B843M1,684%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SW vs TCLAF: Fundamental Ratings
SW
TCLAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
38
Fair valued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7374
SMR RATING
1..100
8871
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6052
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
392
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TCLAF's Valuation (18) in the null industry is in the same range as SW (38). This means that TCLAF’s stock grew similarly to SW’s over the last 12 months.

SW's Profit vs Risk Rating (73) in the null industry is in the same range as TCLAF (74). This means that SW’s stock grew similarly to TCLAF’s over the last 12 months.

TCLAF's SMR Rating (71) in the null industry is in the same range as SW (88). This means that TCLAF’s stock grew similarly to SW’s over the last 12 months.

TCLAF's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as SW (60). This means that TCLAF’s stock grew similarly to SW’s over the last 12 months.

SW's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TCLAF (92). This means that SW’s stock grew significantly faster than TCLAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SWTCLAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
61%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TCLAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BOTT32.920.42
+1.29%
Themes Robotics & Automation ETF
RINF32.900.27
+0.83%
ProShares Inflation Expectations
PY50.320.37
+0.73%
Principal Value ETF
JMST50.960.02
+0.03%
JPMorgan Ultra-Short Municipal Inc ETF
MYD10.06-0.02
-0.20%
Blackrock Muniyield Fund

SW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SW has been closely correlated with PKG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SW jumps, then PKG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SW
1D Price
Change %
SW100%
-0.39%
PKG - SW
70%
Closely correlated
+0.81%
IP - SW
68%
Closely correlated
-1.04%
SEE - SW
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.74%
GEF - SW
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.02%
SLGN - SW
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.54%
More

TCLAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TCLAF and CCDBF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TCLAF and CCDBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TCLAF
1D Price
Change %
TCLAF100%
N/A
CCDBF - TCLAF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.64%
SUMXF - TCLAF
19%
Poorly correlated
+0.07%
RPKIF - TCLAF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VKSC - TCLAF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SW - TCLAF
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.39%
More