SVMLF
Price
$0.45
Change
-$0.02 (-4.26%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
293.86M
VRRCF
Price
$0.01
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
1.91M
Interact to see
Advertisement

SVMLF vs VRRCF

Header iconSVMLF vs VRRCF Comparison
Open Charts SVMLF vs VRRCFBanner chart's image
Sovereign Metals
Price$0.45
Change-$0.02 (-4.26%)
Volume$176.24K
Capitalization293.86M
VR Resources
Price$0.01
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$28.5K
Capitalization1.91M
SVMLF vs VRRCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SVMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VRRCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SVMLF vs. VRRCF commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SVMLF is a Hold and VRRCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (SVMLF: $0.45 vs. VRRCF: $0.01)
Brand notoriety: SVMLF and VRRCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SVMLF: 152% vs. VRRCF: 25%
Market capitalization -- SVMLF: $293.86M vs. VRRCF: $1.91M
SVMLF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $293.86M. VRRCF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $1.91M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SVMLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileVRRCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SVMLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • VRRCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, VRRCF is a better buy in the long-term than SVMLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SVMLF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VRRCF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SVMLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • VRRCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, VRRCF is a better buy in the short-term than SVMLF.

Price Growth

SVMLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while VRRCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +43.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +6.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +50.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +116.62%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+6.26% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SVMLF($294M) has a higher market cap than VRRCF($1.91M). SVMLF YTD gains are higher at: -0.331 vs. VRRCF (-64.951). VRRCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -830.23K vs. SVMLF (-33.22M).
SVMLFVRRCFSVMLF / VRRCF
Capitalization294M1.91M15,361%
EBITDA-33.22M-830.23K4,001%
Gain YTD-0.331-64.9511%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/A0-
Total CashN/A255K-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
VRRCF: Fundamental Ratings
VRRCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
99
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
88
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
90

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SVMLFVRRCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
56%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SVMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VRRCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TEF5.040.03
+0.60%
Telefonica SA
PULM4.430.02
+0.45%
Pulmatrix
UBFO9.590.01
+0.10%
United Security Bancshares
AMBA83.28-0.12
-0.14%
Ambarella
SGML7.03-0.17
-2.36%
Sigma Lithium Corp

SVMLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SVMLF and VRRCF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SVMLF and VRRCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SVMLF
1D Price
Change %
SVMLF100%
-3.11%
VRRCF - SVMLF
23%
Poorly correlated
+15.32%
PMMCF - SVMLF
6%
Poorly correlated
-4.44%
METOF - SVMLF
5%
Poorly correlated
+10.56%
ELMTF - SVMLF
2%
Poorly correlated
-2.14%
DETRF - SVMLF
2%
Poorly correlated
-1.78%
More

VRRCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that VRRCF and SVMLF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VRRCF and SVMLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VRRCF
1D Price
Change %
VRRCF100%
+15.32%
SVMLF - VRRCF
23%
Poorly correlated
-3.11%
UURAF - VRRCF
9%
Poorly correlated
+1.11%
VZLA - VRRCF
7%
Poorly correlated
+4.42%
WMLLF - VRRCF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TSKFF - VRRCF
5%
Poorly correlated
-2.18%
More