SVIN
Price
$4.10
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
32.88M
TBVPY
Price
$36.03
Change
-$1.71 (-4.53%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Capitalization
11.42B
Interact to see
Advertisement

SVIN vs TBVPY

Header iconSVIN vs TBVPY Comparison
Open Charts SVIN vs TBVPYBanner chart's image
Scheid Vineyards
Price$4.10
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization32.88M
Thai Beverage Public
Price$36.03
Change-$1.71 (-4.53%)
Volume$311
Capitalization11.42B
SVIN vs TBVPY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SVIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TBVPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SVIN vs. TBVPY commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SVIN is a Buy and TBVPY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (SVIN: $4.10 vs. TBVPY: $36.03)
Brand notoriety: SVIN and TBVPY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Beverages: Alcoholic industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SVIN: 9% vs. TBVPY: 62%
Market capitalization -- SVIN: $32.88M vs. TBVPY: $11.42B
SVIN [@Beverages: Alcoholic] is valued at $32.88M. TBVPY’s [@Beverages: Alcoholic] market capitalization is $11.42B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Beverages: Alcoholic] industry ranges from $19.33T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Beverages: Alcoholic] industry is $21.7B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SVIN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTBVPY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SVIN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TBVPY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TBVPY is a better buy in the long-term than SVIN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SVIN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TBVPY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SVIN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • TBVPY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SVIN is a better buy in the short-term than TBVPY.

Price Growth

SVIN (@Beverages: Alcoholic) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TBVPY (@Beverages: Alcoholic) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Alcoholic industry was +1.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.80%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Beverages: Alcoholic (+1.12% weekly)

The alcoholic beverage market includes beer, wine, and spirits. From $230 billion in 2015, the industry has grown to around $250 billion by 2019. In recent years, alcoholic beverage makers have been looking to expand distribution and purchase channels, such as through online stores (e.g. e-commerce platform Drizly) and convenience stores. Anheuser-Busch In Bev and Diageo are major global alcoholic beverage companies, while U.S.-owned companies include Constellation Brands and Brown-Forman Corp. among several others.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TBVPY($11.4B) has a higher market cap than SVIN($32.9M). TBVPY YTD gains are higher at: 19.426 vs. SVIN (-13.684). TBVPY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 53.5B vs. SVIN (-4.58M). TBVPY has more cash in the bank: 45.4B vs. SVIN (1.63M). SVIN has less debt than TBVPY: SVIN (121M) vs TBVPY (211B). TBVPY has higher revenues than SVIN: TBVPY (278B) vs SVIN (52.5M).
SVINTBVPYSVIN / TBVPY
Capitalization32.9M11.4B0%
EBITDA-4.58M53.5B-0%
Gain YTD-13.68419.426-70%
P/E RatioN/A12.95-
Revenue52.5M278B0%
Total Cash1.63M45.4B0%
Total Debt121M211B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SVIN vs TBVPY: Fundamental Ratings
SVIN
TBVPY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
354
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6349
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6368
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TBVPY's Valuation (12) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SVIN (66). This means that TBVPY’s stock grew somewhat faster than SVIN’s over the last 12 months.

TBVPY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SVIN (100). This means that TBVPY’s stock grew similarly to SVIN’s over the last 12 months.

SVIN's SMR Rating (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TBVPY (54). This means that SVIN’s stock grew somewhat faster than TBVPY’s over the last 12 months.

TBVPY's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as SVIN (63). This means that TBVPY’s stock grew similarly to SVIN’s over the last 12 months.

SVIN's P/E Growth Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as TBVPY (68). This means that SVIN’s stock grew similarly to TBVPY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SVINTBVPY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
28%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
25%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
22%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
18%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
11%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
7%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SVIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TBVPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MHK104.901.55
+1.50%
Mohawk Industries
INEO1.24-0.02
-1.59%
INNEOVA Holdings Limited
CDLR20.31-0.46
-2.21%
Cadeler A/S American Depositary Share (each representing four (4)
NYXH7.47-0.21
-2.73%
Nyxoah SA
MKTW18.95-0.85
-4.29%
MarketWise Inc

SVIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SVIN and CRHKF have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SVIN and CRHKF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SVIN
1D Price
Change %
SVIN100%
N/A
CRHKF - SVIN
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TBVPF - SVIN
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
STBFY - SVIN
12%
Poorly correlated
+0.76%
TSGTY - SVIN
11%
Poorly correlated
-7.27%
TBVPY - SVIN
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

TBVPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TBVPY has been loosely correlated with KNBWF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TBVPY jumps, then KNBWF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TBVPY
1D Price
Change %
TBVPY100%
N/A
KNBWF - TBVPY
59%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CABGY - TBVPY
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.18%
FMXUF - TBVPY
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CBYDF - TBVPY
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KNBWY - TBVPY
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.14%
More