SVIN
Price
$4.10
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
32.88M
TBVPF
Price
$0.34
Change
-$0.06 (-15.00%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Capitalization
11.42B
Interact to see
Advertisement

SVIN vs TBVPF

Header iconSVIN vs TBVPF Comparison
Open Charts SVIN vs TBVPFBanner chart's image
Scheid Vineyards
Price$4.10
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization32.88M
Thai Beverage Public
Price$0.34
Change-$0.06 (-15.00%)
Volume$8.08K
Capitalization11.42B
SVIN vs TBVPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SVIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TBVPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SVIN vs. TBVPF commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SVIN is a Buy and TBVPF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (SVIN: $4.10 vs. TBVPF: $0.34)
Brand notoriety: SVIN and TBVPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Beverages: Alcoholic industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SVIN: 9% vs. TBVPF: 26%
Market capitalization -- SVIN: $32.88M vs. TBVPF: $11.42B
SVIN [@Beverages: Alcoholic] is valued at $32.88M. TBVPF’s [@Beverages: Alcoholic] market capitalization is $11.42B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Beverages: Alcoholic] industry ranges from $19.33T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Beverages: Alcoholic] industry is $21.7B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SVIN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTBVPF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SVIN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TBVPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both SVIN and TBVPF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SVIN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TBVPF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SVIN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • TBVPF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SVIN is a better buy in the short-term than TBVPF.

Price Growth

SVIN (@Beverages: Alcoholic) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TBVPF (@Beverages: Alcoholic) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Alcoholic industry was +1.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.80%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Beverages: Alcoholic (+1.12% weekly)

The alcoholic beverage market includes beer, wine, and spirits. From $230 billion in 2015, the industry has grown to around $250 billion by 2019. In recent years, alcoholic beverage makers have been looking to expand distribution and purchase channels, such as through online stores (e.g. e-commerce platform Drizly) and convenience stores. Anheuser-Busch In Bev and Diageo are major global alcoholic beverage companies, while U.S.-owned companies include Constellation Brands and Brown-Forman Corp. among several others.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TBVPF($11.4B) has a higher market cap than SVIN($32.9M). TBVPF YTD gains are higher at: -8.081 vs. SVIN (-13.684). TBVPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 53.5B vs. SVIN (-4.58M). TBVPF has more cash in the bank: 45.4B vs. SVIN (1.63M). SVIN has less debt than TBVPF: SVIN (121M) vs TBVPF (211B). TBVPF has higher revenues than SVIN: TBVPF (278B) vs SVIN (52.5M).
SVINTBVPFSVIN / TBVPF
Capitalization32.9M11.4B0%
EBITDA-4.58M53.5B-0%
Gain YTD-13.684-8.081169%
P/E RatioN/A12.58-
Revenue52.5M278B0%
Total Cash1.63M45.4B0%
Total Debt121M211B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SVIN vs TBVPF: Fundamental Ratings
SVIN
TBVPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
354
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6362
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6366
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TBVPF's Valuation (11) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SVIN (66). This means that TBVPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SVIN’s over the last 12 months.

TBVPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SVIN (100). This means that TBVPF’s stock grew similarly to SVIN’s over the last 12 months.

SVIN's SMR Rating (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TBVPF (54). This means that SVIN’s stock grew somewhat faster than TBVPF’s over the last 12 months.

TBVPF's Price Growth Rating (62) in the null industry is in the same range as SVIN (63). This means that TBVPF’s stock grew similarly to SVIN’s over the last 12 months.

SVIN's P/E Growth Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as TBVPF (66). This means that SVIN’s stock grew similarly to TBVPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SVINTBVPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SVIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TBVPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EBON3.310.04
+1.25%
Ebang International Holdings
FBK45.400.13
+0.29%
FB Financial Corp
RHI41.32-0.09
-0.22%
Robert Half
REGCO22.36-0.06
-0.27%
Regency Centers Corp
CVRX5.82-0.05
-0.85%
CVRx

SVIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SVIN and CRHKF have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SVIN and CRHKF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SVIN
1D Price
Change %
SVIN100%
N/A
CRHKF - SVIN
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TBVPF - SVIN
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
STBFY - SVIN
12%
Poorly correlated
+0.76%
TSGTY - SVIN
11%
Poorly correlated
-7.27%
TBVPY - SVIN
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

TBVPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TBVPF and SVIN have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TBVPF and SVIN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TBVPF
1D Price
Change %
TBVPF100%
N/A
SVIN - TBVPF
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TBVPY - TBVPF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VDKB - TBVPF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TSRYY - TBVPF
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.40%
STBFY - TBVPF
0%
Poorly correlated
+0.76%
More