SVIIU
Price
$11.96
Change
+$0.16 (+1.36%)
Updated
Jul 21, 01:53 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
N/A
TLGUF
Price
$16.50
Change
+$1.51 (+10.07%)
Updated
Jul 21 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

SVIIU vs TLGUF

Header iconSVIIU vs TLGUF Comparison
Open Charts SVIIU vs TLGUFBanner chart's image
Spring Valley Acquisition
Price$11.96
Change+$0.16 (+1.36%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
TLGY Acquisition
Price$16.50
Change+$1.51 (+10.07%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
SVIIU vs TLGUF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SVIIU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TLGUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SVIIU vs. TLGUF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SVIIU is a Hold and TLGUF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (SVIIU: $11.80 vs. TLGUF: $16.50)
Brand notoriety: SVIIU and TLGUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SVIIU: 34% vs. TLGUF: 100%
Market capitalization -- SVIIU: $0 vs. TLGUF: $0
SVIIU [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $0. TLGUF’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $4.56B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SVIIU’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTLGUF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • SVIIU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TLGUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, TLGUF is a better buy in the long-term than SVIIU.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SVIIU’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TLGUF’s TA Score has 0 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SVIIU’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • TLGUF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SVIIU is a better buy in the short-term than TLGUF.

Price Growth

SVIIU (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TLGUF (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +10.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +82.89%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+0.43% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TLGUF YTD gains are higher at: 33.172 vs. SVIIU (4.332). SVIIU has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -875.46K vs. TLGUF (-1.73M). SVIIU has more cash in the bank: 1.24M vs. TLGUF (40.6K). SVIIU has less debt than TLGUF: SVIIU (269K) vs TLGUF (1.29M). SVIIU (0) and TLGUF (0) have equivalent revenues.
SVIIUTLGUFSVIIU / TLGUF
CapitalizationN/AN/A-
EBITDA-875.46K-1.73M51%
Gain YTD4.33233.17213%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash1.24M40.6K3,057%
Total Debt269K1.29M21%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SVIIUTLGUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
7%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
4%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
24%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
14%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
15%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SVIIU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TLGUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WCC214.432.68
+1.27%
Wesco International
NGVC39.980.19
+0.48%
Natural Grocers BY Vitamin Cottage
CNOBP23.40N/A
-0.01%
ConnectOne Bancorp
NUTX95.02-0.74
-0.77%
Nutex Health Inc.
TLRY0.69-0.01
-2.03%
Tilray Brands

SVIIU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SVIIU and ALSUF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SVIIU and ALSUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SVIIU
1D Price
Change %
SVIIU100%
N/A
ALSUF - SVIIU
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHACU - SVIIU
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TLGUF - SVIIU
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ALCY - SVIIU
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ATMVU - SVIIU
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

TLGUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TLGUF has been loosely correlated with ISRLU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TLGUF jumps, then ISRLU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TLGUF
1D Price
Change %
TLGUF100%
N/A
ISRLU - TLGUF
40%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CSLUF - TLGUF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EONR - TLGUF
27%
Poorly correlated
+2.95%
TREE - TLGUF
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.54%
SVIIU - TLGUF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More